Six-month angiographic and clinical follow-up of patients prospectively randomized to receive either tirofiban or placebo during angioplasty in the RESTORE trial
C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD, FACC ,
Mukesh Goel, MD ,
David J. Cohen, MD, MSc ,
Robert N. Piana, MD, FACC ,
Lawrence I. Deckelbaum, MD, FACC||,
Katherine E. Harris, DrPH||,
Spencer B. King, III, MD, FACC¶ for the RESTORE Investigators#
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA
Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
|| Merck Research Laboratories, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, USA
¶ Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Cumulative distribution functions of minimal lumen diameters before and after intervention and at 6 months of follow-up for tirofiban- and placebo-treated patients. As can be seen, the cumulative distribution functions do not differ significantly between the treatment groups and are nearly superimposible at all time points.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves of clinical outcomes at multiple time points. The 3% absolute reduction in this composite end point that was observed within 48 h of initial treatment persisted over the 6-month follow-up period, but there was no evidence of additional late clinical benefit. At 6 months, the composite end point occurred in 1,069 placebo-treated patients (27.1%) and in 1,070 tirofiban-treated patients (24.1%, p = 0.11).
|
|
|