Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1837-1846, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.011 (Published online 30 September 2009).
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Go to related CVN interview
Right arrow View Related Go to related CVN interview Interview
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2009.08.011v1
54/20/1837    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daubert, C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Daubert, C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY

Prevention of Disease Progression by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Insights From the European Cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) Trial

Claude Daubert, MD*,*, Michael R. Gold, MD, PhD{dagger}, William T. Abraham, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Stefano Ghio, MD§, Christian Hassager, MD, PhD||, Grahame Goode, MD, Tamás Szili-Török, MD#, Cecilia Linde, MD, PhD** on behalf of the REVERSE Study Group

* Département de Cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, CHU, Rennes, France
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
{ddagger} Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
§ Division of Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
|| Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Cardiology Research, Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, Blackpool, United Kingdom
# Hungarian Institute of Cardiology, Budapest, Hungary
** Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Manuscript received May 29, 2009; revised manuscript received July 8, 2009, accepted August 3, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Claude Daubert, Service de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, Centre cardio-pneumologique, Hôpital Pontchaillou-CHU, Rennes 35033, France (Email: jean-claude.daubert{at}chu-rennes.fr).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the European cohort of patients enrolled in the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial.

Background: Previous data suggest that CRT slows disease progression and improves the outcomes of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and a wide QRS complex.

Methods: We randomly assigned 262 recipients of CRT pacemakers or defibrillators, with QRS ≥120 ms and LV ejection fraction ≤40% to active (CRT ON; n = 180) versus control (CRT OFF; n = 82) treatment, for 24 months. Mean baseline LV ejection fraction was 28.0%. All patients were in sinus rhythm and receiving optimal medical therapy. The primary study end point was the proportion worsened by the heart failure (HF) clinical composite response. The main secondary study end point was left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi).

Results: In the CRT ON group, 19% of patients were worsened versus 34% in the CRT OFF group (p = 0.01). The LVESVi decreased by a mean of 27.5 ± 31.8 ml/m2 in the CRT ON group versus 2.7 ± 25.8 ml/m2 in the CRT OFF group (p < 0.0001). Time to first HF hospital stay or death (hazard ratio: 0.38; p = 0.003) was significantly delayed by CRT.

Conclusions: After 24 months of CRT, and compared with those of control subjects, clinical outcomes and LV function were improved and LV dimensions were decreased in this patient population in New York Heart Association functional classes I or II. These observations suggest that CRT prevents the progression of disease in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic LV dysfunction. (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction [REVERSE]; NCT00271154)

Key Words: biventricular stimulation • cardiac resynchronization therapy • heart failure • randomized controlled trial • reverse cardiac remodeling

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy
  HF = heart failure
  ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  LVESVi = left ventricular end-systolic volume index
  NYHA = New York Heart Association
  SAE = serious adverse event


Related Articles

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A32. [Full Text] [PDF]

Is it Time to Expand the Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Patients With Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure?
Derek V. Exner
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 1847-1849. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. V. Exner
Is it Time to Expand the Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Patients With Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 10, 2009; 54(20): 1847 - 1849.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement