|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 52:869-881, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.055
(Published online 2 July 2008). © 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agonist Pioglitazone Represses Inflammation in a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-
–Dependent Manner In Vitro and In Vivo in Mice



,
,
,*
* Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Clinical Research Center, Joslin Diabetes Center
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Plutzky has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL071745)
Manuscript received March 10, 2008; revised manuscript received April 22, 2008, accepted April 29, 2008.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jorge Plutzky, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, NRB 742, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 (Email: jplutzky{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu).
Objectives: Our aim was to investigate if the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-
agonist pioglitazone modulates inflammation through PPAR
mechanisms.
Background: The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are insulin-sensitizing PPAR
agonists used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Despite evidence for TZDs limiting inflammation and atherosclerosis, questions exist regarding differential responses to TZDs. In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled 16-week trial among recently diagnosed T2DM subjects (n = 34), pioglitazone-treated subjects manifested lower triglycerides and lacked the increase in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecules (sVCAM)-1 evident in the placebo group. Previously we reported PPAR
but not PPAR
agonists could repress VCAM-1 expression. Since both triglyceride-lowering and VCAM-1 repression characterize PPAR
activation, we studied pioglitazone's effects via PPAR
.
Methods: Pioglitazone effects on known PPAR
responses—ligand binding domain activation and PPAR
target gene expression—were tested in vitro and in vivo, including in wild-type and PPAR
-deficient cells and mice, and compared with the effects of other PPAR
(rosiglitazone) and PPAR
(WY14643) agonists.
Results: Pioglitazone repressed endothelial TNF
-induced VCAM-1 messenger ribonucleic acid expression and promoter activity, and induced hepatic I
B
in a manner dependent on both pioglitazone exposure and PPAR
expression. Pioglitazone also activated the PPAR
ligand binding domain and induced PPAR
target gene expression, with in vitro effects that were most pronounced in endothelial cells. In vivo, pioglitazone administration modulated sVCAM-1 levels and I
B
expression in wild-type but not PPAR
-deficient mice.
Conclusions: Pioglitazone regulates inflammatory target genes in hepatic (I
B
) and endothelial (VCAM-1) settings in a PPAR
-dependent manner. These data offer novel mechanisms that may underlie distinct TZD responses.
Key Words: inflammation VCAM-1 PPAR-s
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Related Article
Activation Make the Difference?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 52: 882-884.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Kintscher Pharmacological Differences of Glitazones: Does Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} Activation Make the Difference? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 2, 2008; 52(10): 882 - 884. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |