CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 3-Tesla for the Detection of Coronary Artery DiseaseA Comparison With 1.5-Tesla
Adrian S.H. Cheng, MBBS, MRCP*, ,
Tammy J. Pegg, MBChB, MRCP*,
Theodoros D. Karamitsos, MD*, ,
Nick Searle, DCR(R) ,
Michael Jerosch-Herold, PhD||,
Robin P. Choudhury, DM, MRCP ,
Adrian P. Banning, MD, FRCP, FESC ,
Stefan Neubauer, MD, FRCP*, ,
Matthew D. Robson, PhD*, and
Joseph B. Selvanayagam, DPhil, FRACP, FESC*, ,*
* University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Oxford, United Kingdom
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Department of Radiology
Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; and the ||Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
Manuscript received September 21, 2006;
revised manuscript received March 2, 2007,
accepted March 6, 2007.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Joseph B. Selvanayagam, University of Oxford, Cardiovascular Medicine, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom (Email: joseph.selvanayagam{at}cardiov.ox.ac.uk).
Objectives: This study was designed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging at 3-Tesla (T) in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Background: Myocardial perfusion imaging is considered one of the most compelling applications for CMR at 3-T. The 3-T systems provide increased signal-to-noise ratio and contrast enhancement (compared with 1.5-T), which can potentially improve spatial resolution and image quality.
Methods: Sixty-one patients (age 64 ± 8 years) referred for elective diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) for investigation of exertional chest pain were studied (before angiogram) with first-pass perfusion CMR at both 1.5- and 3-T and at stress (140 µg/kg/min intravenous adenosine, Adenoscan, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Guildford, United Kingdom) and rest. Four short-axis images were acquired during every heartbeat using a saturation recovery fast-gradient echo sequence and 0.04 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA bolus injection. Quantitative CA served as the reference standard. Perfusion deficits were interpreted visually by 2 blinded observers. We defined CAD angiographically as the presence of 1 stenosis of 50% diameter in any of the main epicardial coronary arteries or their branches with a diameter of 2 mm.
Results: The prevalence of CAD was 66%. All perfusion images were found to be visually interpretable for diagnosis. We found that 3-T CMR perfusion imaging provided a higher diagnostic accuracy (90% vs. 82%), sensitivity (98% vs. 90%), specificity (76% vs. 67%), positive predictive value (89% vs. 84%), and negative predictive value (94% vs. 78%) for detection of significant coronary stenoses compared with 1.5-T. The diagnostic performance of 3-T perfusion imaging was significantly greater than that of 1.5-T in identifying both single-vessel disease (area under receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] curve: 0.89 ± 0.05 vs. 0.70 ± 0.08; p < 0.05) and multivessel disease (area under ROC curve: 0.95 ± 0.03 vs. 0.82 ± 0.06; p < 0.05). There was no difference between field strengths for the overall detection of coronary disease (area under ROC curve: 0.87 ± 0.05 vs. 0.78 ± 0.06; p = 0.23).
Conclusions: Our study showed that 3-T CMR perfusion imaging is superior to 1.5-T for prediction of significant single- and multi-vessel coronary disease, and 3-T may become the preferred CMR field strength for myocardial perfusion assessment in clinical practice.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance | | CNR = contrast-to-noise ratio | | IV = intravenous | | LAD = left anterior descending | | LV = left ventricle | | MI = myocardial infarction | | PET = positron emission tomography | | RCA = right coronary artery | | ROC = receiver operating characteristic | | ROI = region of interest | | SI = signal intensity | | SNR = signal-to-noise ratio | | SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography | | T = Tesla |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Plein, J. Schwitter, D. Suerder, J. P. Greenwood, P. Boesiger, and S. Kozerke
k-Space and Time Sensitivity Encoding-accelerated Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T
Radiology,
November 1, 2008;
249(2):
493 - 500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Plein, S. Kozerke, D. Suerder, T. F. Luescher, J. P. Greenwood, P. Boesiger, and J. Schwitter
High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J.,
September 1, 2008;
29(17):
2148 - 2155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Klem, S. Greulich, J. F. Heitner, H. Kim, H. Vogelsberg, E.-M. Kispert, S. R. Ambati, C. Bruch, M. Parker, R. M. Judd, et al.
Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Testing for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Women
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2008;
1(4):
436 - 445.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Selvanayagam
Women With Chest Pain: Expanding the Diagnostic Armamentarium
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2008;
1(4):
446 - 449.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild
Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications
Radiology,
April 1, 2008;
247(1):
16 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S.H. Cheng, J. B. Selvanayagam, M. Jerosch-Herold, W. J. van Gaal, T. D. Karamitsos, S. Neubauer, and A. P. Banning
Percutaneous Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Improves Regional Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow and Contractility: Insights From Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
February 1, 2008;
1(1):
44 - 53.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|