cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:2440-2449, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.028 (Published online 7 June 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Accompanying Videos
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2007.03.028v1
49/25/2440    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A. S.H.
Right arrow Articles by Selvanayagam, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A. S.H.
Right arrow Articles by Selvanayagam, J. B.

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 3-Tesla for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

A Comparison With 1.5-Tesla

Adrian S.H. Cheng, MBBS, MRCP*,{dagger}, Tammy J. Pegg, MBChB, MRCP*, Theodoros D. Karamitsos, MD*,{dagger}, Nick Searle, DCR(R){ddagger}, Michael Jerosch-Herold, PhD||, Robin P. Choudhury, DM, MRCP§, Adrian P. Banning, MD, FRCP, FESC§, Stefan Neubauer, MD, FRCP*,{dagger}, Matthew D. Robson, PhD*,{dagger} and Joseph B. Selvanayagam, DPhil, FRACP, FESC*,{dagger},*

* University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Oxford, United Kingdom
{dagger} Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
{ddagger} Department of Radiology
§ Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; and the ||Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Manuscript received September 21, 2006; revised manuscript received March 2, 2007, accepted March 6, 2007.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Joseph B. Selvanayagam, University of Oxford, Cardiovascular Medicine, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom (Email: joseph.selvanayagam{at}cardiov.ox.ac.uk).

Objectives: This study was designed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging at 3-Tesla (T) in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Background: Myocardial perfusion imaging is considered one of the most compelling applications for CMR at 3-T. The 3-T systems provide increased signal-to-noise ratio and contrast enhancement (compared with 1.5-T), which can potentially improve spatial resolution and image quality.

Methods: Sixty-one patients (age 64 ± 8 years) referred for elective diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) for investigation of exertional chest pain were studied (before angiogram) with first-pass perfusion CMR at both 1.5- and 3-T and at stress (140 µg/kg/min intravenous adenosine, Adenoscan, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Guildford, United Kingdom) and rest. Four short-axis images were acquired during every heartbeat using a saturation recovery fast-gradient echo sequence and 0.04 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA bolus injection. Quantitative CA served as the reference standard. Perfusion deficits were interpreted visually by 2 blinded observers. We defined CAD angiographically as the presence of ≥1 stenosis of ≥50% diameter in any of the main epicardial coronary arteries or their branches with a diameter of ≥2 mm.

Results: The prevalence of CAD was 66%. All perfusion images were found to be visually interpretable for diagnosis. We found that 3-T CMR perfusion imaging provided a higher diagnostic accuracy (90% vs. 82%), sensitivity (98% vs. 90%), specificity (76% vs. 67%), positive predictive value (89% vs. 84%), and negative predictive value (94% vs. 78%) for detection of significant coronary stenoses compared with 1.5-T. The diagnostic performance of 3-T perfusion imaging was significantly greater than that of 1.5-T in identifying both single-vessel disease (area under receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] curve: 0.89 ± 0.05 vs. 0.70 ± 0.08; p < 0.05) and multivessel disease (area under ROC curve: 0.95 ± 0.03 vs. 0.82 ± 0.06; p < 0.05). There was no difference between field strengths for the overall detection of coronary disease (area under ROC curve: 0.87 ± 0.05 vs. 0.78 ± 0.06; p = 0.23).

Conclusions: Our study showed that 3-T CMR perfusion imaging is superior to 1.5-T for prediction of significant single- and multi-vessel coronary disease, and 3-T may become the preferred CMR field strength for myocardial perfusion assessment in clinical practice.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  CNR = contrast-to-noise ratio
  IV = intravenous
  LAD = left anterior descending
  LV = left ventricle
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PET = positron emission tomography
  RCA = right coronary artery
  ROC = receiver operating characteristic
  ROI = region of interest
  SI = signal intensity
  SNR = signal-to-noise ratio
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography
  T = Tesla




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Plein, J. Schwitter, D. Suerder, J. P. Greenwood, P. Boesiger, and S. Kozerke
k-Space and Time Sensitivity Encoding-accelerated Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 493 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Plein, S. Kozerke, D. Suerder, T. F. Luescher, J. P. Greenwood, P. Boesiger, and J. Schwitter
High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2008; 29(17): 2148 - 2155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
I. Klem, S. Greulich, J. F. Heitner, H. Kim, H. Vogelsberg, E.-M. Kispert, S. R. Ambati, C. Bruch, M. Parker, R. M. Judd, et al.
Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Testing for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Women
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 436 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
J. Selvanayagam
Women With Chest Pain: Expanding the Diagnostic Armamentarium
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 446 - 449.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild
Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
A. S.H. Cheng, J. B. Selvanayagam, M. Jerosch-Herold, W. J. van Gaal, T. D. Karamitsos, S. Neubauer, and A. P. Banning
Percutaneous Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Improves Regional Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow and Contractility: Insights From Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 44 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home