Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:1309-1313, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.011 (Published online 10 September 2005).
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
j.jacc.2005.07.011v1
46/7/1309    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claydon, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Claydon, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, R.

CLINICAL RESEARCH

Increased Postural Sway in Control Subjects With Poor Orthostatic Tolerance

Victoria E. Claydon, PhD* and Roger Hainsworth, MB, PhD, DSc

University of Leeds, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Leeds, United Kingdom

Manuscript received February 2, 2005; revised manuscript received May 31, 2005, accepted June 6, 2005.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Victoria E. Claydon, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom (Email: claydon{at}icord.org).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate postural sway in control subjects with good and poor orthostatic tolerance (OT).

BACKGROUND: Some asymptomatic volunteers, when subjected to a progressive orthostatic stress test, show early presyncope. We hypothesized that normal subjects with poor OT do not usually faint because they adopt a strategy of increased lower limb movement, which helps maintain venous return.

METHODS: In 12 asymptomatic subjects with good OT and 11 with poor OT, assessed by the combined orthostatic stress of head-up tilting and lower body suction, we determined postural sway using a force platform after 1, 5, and 10 min of motionless standing.

RESULTS: The subjects with poor tolerance had greater distances and velocities of sway in the anteroposterior direction but not the mediolateral direction. There was a significant negative correlation between postural sway and orthostatic tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that in normal subjects with poor OT during a passive orthostatic stress test, their leg movements tend to be greater when standing. These movements are likely to enhance venous return and may at least partly explain why, despite their poor test results, they do not normally faint.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  NS = not significant
  OT = orthostatic tolerance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
V E Claydon and R Hainsworth
Postural sway in patients with syncope and poor orthostatic tolerance.
Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1688 - 1689.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Hainsworth and M. J. Drinkhill
COUNTERPOINT: ACTIVE VENOCONSTRICTION IS NOT IMPORTANT IN MAINTAINING OR RAISING END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME AND STROKE VOLUME DURING EXERCISE AND ORTHOSTASIS
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1264 - 1265.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement