Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 9:1385-1396
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, G.
Right arrow Articles by Work, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, G.
Right arrow Articles by Work, J.

Clinician decisions and computers

GA Diamond, BH Pollock, and JW Work

The clinician's decisions are subject to numerous distorting influences. Computer decision aids can help avoid these distortions by placing the clinician's limited personal experience into broader perspective through comparison with a larger repository of clinically relevant information; by making explicit the assumptions implied by his or her decisions; and by alerting the clinician whenever the decisions made do not appear consistent with these assumptions, with the available information or with the conventional rules of logic. Practical standards of performance with respect to the development, validation and clinical application of these decision aids are still in evolution, however, and a variety of ethical and legal issues have yet to be addressed. Despite the promise of computer decision aids, it remains to be seen whether their diffusion into medical practice will improve the quality and cost of health care.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul
Prior convictions: bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1929 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. M. Plasencia, B. W. Alderman, A. E. Baron, R. T. Rolfs, and E. J. Boyko
A Method to Describe Physician Decision Thresholds and Its Application in Examining the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease Based on Exercise Treadmill Testing
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1992; 12(3): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement