JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 9:1357-1363
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludmer, P.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ludmer, P.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, P.

Efficacy of propafenone in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: electrophysiologic findings and long-term follow-up

PL Ludmer, NE McGowan, EM Antman, and PL Friedman

The efficacy and safety of intravenous propafenone was studied in 10 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and in 2 patients with a concealed accessory pathway. During electrophysiologic study, the effect of propafenone on the effective refractory period of the accessory pathway was determined, as well as its effect during orthodromic atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Propafenone caused significant increases in the accessory pathway refractory period, both in the anterograde direction (290 +/- 19 versus 474 +/- 50 ms, p less than 0.05) and in the retrograde direction (238 +/- 15 versus 408 +/- 44 ms, p less than 0.05). Complete anterograde accessory pathway conduction block occurred in four patients. Sustained AV reentrant tachycardia was inducible in 11 patients before administration of propafenone. Drug infusion during AV reentrant tachycardia promptly terminated arrhythmia in 10 of these 11 patients and caused slowing of AV reentrant tachycardia in the remaining patient. Before propafenone, sustained atrial fibrillation was inducible in six patients and nonsustained atrial fibrillation in four patients. After propafenone, no patient had inducible sustained atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, propafenone caused a marked decrease in peak ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Eight patients have been treated with oral propafenone and followed up for 12 +/- 2 months. All have remained virtually free of recurrent arrhythmia and none has developed significant side effects. Propafenone is a very promising agent for emergency intravenous therapy as well as long-term oral therapy in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Delacretaz
Supraventricular Tachycardia
N. Engl. J. Med., March 9, 2006; 354(10): 1039 - 1051.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
M. Valderrabano and B. N. Singh
Review : Electrophysiologic and Antiarrhythmic Effects of Propafenone: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(3): 183 - 198.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
V. Santinelli, M. De Paola, P. Turco, D. Smimmo, and M. Chiariello
Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia: Experience with Propafenone
Angiology, June 1, 1989; 40(6): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.