Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac risk before elective vascular surgery

The prognostic utility for predicting cardiac events was determined for dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy, exercise stress testing (when possible; n = 69) and multiple clinical variables in 100 consecutive patients admitted for elective surgical repair of peripheral vascular disease. After initial noninvasive evaluation, 11 patients were referred for coronary angiography and the remaining 89 patients had surgery without further cardiac studies. Fifteen patients (17%) had a postoperative myocardial infarction, one of which was fatal. Of these 15 patients, 14 had thallium redistribution and 3 had positive ST segment depression during stress testing. Among the many variables tested, the presence of redistribution on serial dipyridamole-thallium images was the most significant predictor of serious cardiac events. All 11 patients who had coronary angiography had both redistribution and multivessel coronary artery disease. Four of these 11 patients died during follow-up and 6 had coronary artery bypass surgery. It is concluded that dipyridamole-thallium imaging has significant prognostic utility in predicting postoperative myocardial infarction and death in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease, and is superior to exercise testing or clinical variables in determining cardiac risk. The odds for a serious cardiac event were 23 times greater in a patient with thallium redistribution than in a patient without redistribution, strongly suggesting that myocardial imaging may be used as a primary screening test before elective vascular surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Chang, M. Sarkiss, K. S. Won, J. Swafford, L. Broemeling, and I. Gayed Preoperative Risk Stratification Using Gated Myocardial Perfusion Studies in Patients with Cancer J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 344 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Howell and J. W. Sear Perioperative myocardial injury: individual and population implications Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2004; 93(1): 3 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M D Kertai, E Boersma, J J Bax, M H Heijenbrok-Kal, M G M Hunink, G J L'talien, J R T C Roelandt, H van Urk, and D Poldermans A meta-analysis comparing the prognostic accuracy of six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery Heart, November 1, 2003; 89(11): 1327 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sicari, A. Ripoli, E. Picano, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, R. Di Giovanbattista, G. Minardi, S. Matskeplishvili, S. Ambatiello, G. Pulignano, M. Accarino, et al. Perioperative Prognostic Value of Dipyridamole Echocardiography in Vascular Surgery : A Large-Scale Multicenter Study in 509 Patients Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-269 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hendel, M. H. Chen, G. J. L'Italien, J. B. Newell, S. D. Paul, K. A. Eagle, and J. A. Leppo Sex Differences in Perioperative and Long-term Cardiac Event–Free Survival in Vascular Surgery Patients : An Analysis of Clinical and Scintigraphic Variables Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1044 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. Haljamae and L. E.H. Jivegard Cardiac Risk Factors: The Effect of Preoperative Evaluation on Outcome Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1995; 8(2): 86 - 97. [PDF]

				J.-F. Baron, O. Mundler, M. Bertrand, E. Vicaut, E. Barre, G. Godet, C. M. Samama, P. Coriat, E. Kieffer, and P. Viars Dipyridamole-Thallium Scintigraphy and Gated Radionuclide Angiography to Assess Cardiac Risk before Abdominal Aortic Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., March 10, 1994; 330(10): 663 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. D. Hagen, M. H. Eckman, and S. G. Pauker Aortic Aneurysm in a 74-year-old Man with Coronary Disease and 0bstructive Lung Disease: Is Double Jeopardy Enough? Med Decis Making, December 1, 1989; 9(4): 285 - 299. [PDF]

				R. A. Yeager and G. L. Moneta Assessing Cardiac Risk in Vascular Surgical Patients: Current Status Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1989; 2(2): 18 - 36. [PDF]

				K. J. Cherry JR Management of Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Coronary Artery Disease: Current Trends Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1988; 1(1): 21 - 33. [PDF]