cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 9:163-168
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Paola, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de Paola, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, H.

Influence of left ventricular dysfunction on flecainide therapy

AA de Paola, LN Horowitz, J Morganroth, S Senior, Spielman SR, AM Greenspan, and HR Kay

Seventy-six patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (40 sustained and 36 nonsustained) were treated with oral flecainide. Radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction was 30% or less in 33 patients and greater than 30% in 43 patients. Before flecainide, compensated heart failure was present in 23 patients (ejection fraction less than or equal to 30% in 15 and greater than 30% in 8). Flecainide mean dose was 150 mg twice daily and mean plasma concentration was 720 ng/ml. New or worsened congestive heart failure occurred in seven patients on flecainide therapy, all with an ejection fraction of less than 30%; six had a previous history of compensated heart failure and of these, three died. Ejection fraction was the only independent variable that significantly influenced efficacy and tolerance of flecainide. After 1 year of therapy, efficacy and tolerance was 58% (25 of 43) in patients with an ejection fraction greater than 30% and 12% (4 of 33) in patients with an ejection fraction of 30% or less (p less than 0.001). Thus, congestive heart failure can occur during flecainide therapy, particularly in patients with a previous history of congestive heart failure and ejection fraction of less than 30%, and may particularly limit therapy in these patients. Clinical efficacy and tolerance were significantly lower in patients with an ejection fraction of less than 30%.




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home