Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarction
MS Chang,
H Inoue,
MJ Kallok,
and
DP Zipes
The role of optimal placement of electrodes and mode of shock delivery from a defibrillator was examined in dogs with and without myocardial infarction. Single, double and triple truncated exponential shocks separated by 1 ms were delivered through various electrode combinations and cardiac vectors after electrical induction of ventricular fibrillation. A single shock through a pathway not incorporating the interventricular septum (catheter electrodes or epicardial patches between anterior and posterior left ventricle) required the highest total energy (22.6 and greater than 26.4 J, respectively) and peak voltage (1,004 and greater than 1,094 V, respectively) to terminate ventricular fibrillation. A single shock through a pathway including the interventricular septum required lower total energy and peak voltage to defibrillate. Combinations of two sequential shocks between an intracardiac catheter electrode and anterior left ventricular epicardial patch, between the catheter electrode and subcutaneous extrathoracic plate and between three ventricular epicardial patches all significantly reduced total energy (7.7, 8.7 and 7.8 J, respectively) and peak voltage (424, 436 and 424 V, respectively) needed to defibrillate. Three sequential shocks exerted no significant additional reduction in total energy of the defibrillation threshold than did two sequential shocks. Infarcted canine heart required less peak voltage but not total energy to terminate ventricular fibrillation than did noninfarcted heart. Therefore, two sequential shocks over different pathways reduce both total energy and peak voltage required to terminate ventricular fibrillation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
L. A. Pagan-Carlo, J. J. Allan, K. T. Spencer, C. L. Birkett, R. Myers, and R. E. Kerber
Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 1, 1998;
32(7):
2065 - 2071.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. White, G. P. Walcott, A. E. Pollard, and R. E. Ideker
Myocardial Discontinuities : A Substrate for Producing Virtual Electrodes That Directly Excite the Myocardium by Shocks
Circulation,
May 5, 1998;
97(17):
1738 - 1745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, M. J. Niebauer, P. J. Tchou, and B. L. Wilkoff
Additional Lead Improves Defibrillation Efficacy With an Abdominal `Hot Can' Electrode System
Circulation,
December 16, 1997;
96(12):
4400 - 4407.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt
Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations
Circulation,
November 15, 1995;
92(10):
3082 - 3088.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Saksena, N. G. Tullo, R. B. Krol, and A. M. Mauro
Initial Clinical Experience With Endocardial Defibrillation Using an Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator With a Triple-Electrode System
Arch Intern Med,
October 1, 1989;
149(10):
2333 - 2339.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Saksena and V. Parsonnet
Implantation of a Cardioverter/ Defibrillator Without Thoracotomy Using a Triple Electrode System
JAMA,
January 1, 1988;
259(1):
69 - 72.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
