JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:1348-1354
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, B.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, B.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A.

Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and gated blood pool scintigraphy

BJ Friedman, N Drinkovic, H Miles, WJ Shih, A Mazzoleni, and AN DeMaria

Although left ventricular diastolic filling patterns can be examined by both Doppler velocity recordings and gated blood pool scintigraphy, few data exist regarding a comparison of these techniques. Therefore, Doppler echocardiography and scintigraphy were compared in 25 patients. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was performed using an apical four chamber view with the sample volume at the level of the mitral anulus. Doppler measurements included peak velocity of the early diastolic filling wave, time to peak early diastolic velocity from both end-systole and end-diastole, diastolic time period and diastolic integrated velocity (early, atrial and total). The cross-sectional area of the mitral anulus and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume were estimated from measurements made on the apical four chamber view. Scintigraphic measurements included normalized peak filling rate, time to normalized filling rate from both end-diastole and end-systole, diastolic time period and relative diastolic filling during early and atrial filling. Doppler echocardiography and scintigraphy compared favorably in assessment of fractional filling during early diastole (r = 0.84) and atrial systole (r = 0.85), ratio of early to atrial filling (r = 0.83), diastolic filling period (r = 0.94) and interval from end-diastole to peak early diastolic flow (r = 0.88). Normalized peak filling rate and time to normalized peak filling rate from end-systole did not correlate closely by these two techniques. The differences in normalized peak filling rate may be explained by difficulties in estimating mitral anulus cross-sectional area and left ventricular end-diastolic volume.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.B. Tiras, R. Yalcin, V. Noyan, I. Maral, M. Yildirim, O. Dortlemez, and S. Daya
Alterations in cardiac flow parameters in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 1999; 14(8): 1949 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Vignon, V. Mor-Avi, L. Weinert, R. Koch, K. T. Spencer, and R. M. Lang
Quantitative Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Diastolic Function With Color Kinesis
Circulation, March 24, 1998; 97(11): 1053 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Belardinelli, D. Georgiou, G. Cianci, N. Berman, L. Ginzton, and A. Purcaro
Exercise Training Improves Left Ventricular Diastolic Filling in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy : Clinical and Prognostic Implications
Circulation, June 1, 1995; 91(11): 2775 - 2784.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
R. Taylor
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Clinical Relevance and Assessment by Doppler Echocardiography
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1993; 9(6): 312 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.