Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and gated blood pool scintigraphy
BJ Friedman,
N Drinkovic,
H Miles,
WJ Shih,
A Mazzoleni,
and
AN DeMaria
Although left ventricular diastolic filling patterns can be examined by both Doppler velocity recordings and gated blood pool scintigraphy, few data exist regarding a comparison of these techniques. Therefore, Doppler echocardiography and scintigraphy were compared in 25 patients. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was performed using an apical four chamber view with the sample volume at the level of the mitral anulus. Doppler measurements included peak velocity of the early diastolic filling wave, time to peak early diastolic velocity from both end-systole and end-diastole, diastolic time period and diastolic integrated velocity (early, atrial and total). The cross-sectional area of the mitral anulus and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume were estimated from measurements made on the apical four chamber view. Scintigraphic measurements included normalized peak filling rate, time to normalized filling rate from both end-diastole and end-systole, diastolic time period and relative diastolic filling during early and atrial filling. Doppler echocardiography and scintigraphy compared favorably in assessment of fractional filling during early diastole (r = 0.84) and atrial systole (r = 0.85), ratio of early to atrial filling (r = 0.83), diastolic filling period (r = 0.94) and interval from end-diastole to peak early diastolic flow (r = 0.88). Normalized peak filling rate and time to normalized peak filling rate from end-systole did not correlate closely by these two techniques. The differences in normalized peak filling rate may be explained by difficulties in estimating mitral anulus cross-sectional area and left ventricular end-diastolic volume.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.J.W. van Kraaij, P.E.J. van Pol, A.W. Ruiters, J.B.R.M. de Swart, D.J. Lips, N. Lencer, and P.A.F.M. Doevendans
Diagnosing diastolic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail,
August 1, 2002;
4(4):
419 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.B. Tiras, R. Yalcin, V. Noyan, I. Maral, M. Yildirim, O. Dortlemez, and S. Daya
Alterations in cardiac flow parameters in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome
Hum. Reprod.,
August 1, 1999;
14(8):
1949 - 1952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Vignon, V. Mor-Avi, L. Weinert, R. Koch, K. T. Spencer, and R. M. Lang
Quantitative Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Diastolic Function With Color Kinesis
Circulation,
March 24, 1998;
97(11):
1053 - 1061.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Belardinelli, D. Georgiou, G. Cianci, N. Berman, L. Ginzton, and A. Purcaro
Exercise Training Improves Left Ventricular Diastolic Filling in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy : Clinical and Prognostic Implications
Circulation,
June 1, 1995;
91(11):
2775 - 2784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Taylor
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Clinical Relevance and Assessment by Doppler Echocardiography
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography,
November 1, 1993;
9(6):
312 - 322.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Spirito and B. J. Maron
Doppler Echocardiography for Assessing Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
Ann Intern Med,
July 15, 1988;
109(2):
122 - 126.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|