Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:1195-1210
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaitman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaitman, B.

The changing role of the exercise electrocardiogram as a diagnostic and prognostic test for chronic ischemic heart disease

BR Chaitman

The exercise electrocardiogram has been the subject of intense research over the last 50 years, as both a diagnostic and prognostic method to assess patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. In 1986, the strengths and limitations of the technique to predict coronary and multivessel disease in clinical patient subsets are understood. The diagnostic accuracy of the test is improved by consideration of Bayesian theory, multivariate models and new non-ST segment criteria. Post-test coronary disease risk estimates are best reported in terms of a conditional probability, rather than statements of "positive" or "negative." The value of exercise testing in prognostic risk stratification is considerably enhanced by recent reports of long-term follow-up data in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Powerful prognostic information can be obtained when the clinical, electrocardiographic and physiologic data from the exercise test are used to formulate the post-test risk of a cardiac event, even in patients whose coronary anatomy is known. The changing role of the exercise electrocardiogram as a diagnostic and prognostic test is reviewed, with emphasis on the strengths and limitations of the procedure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, L. A. Fleisher, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 24, 2009; 54(22): e13 - e118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2007 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): e169 - e276.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Kligfield and M. S. Lauer
Exercise Electrocardiogram Testing: Beyond the ST Segment
Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2070 - 2082.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S K S Lairikyengbam and A G Davies
Interpreting exercise treadmill tests needs scoring system
BMJ, August 24, 2002; 325(7361): 443 - 443.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. L. Geleijnse, A. Elhendy, P. M. Fioretti, and J. R. T. C. Roelandt
Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2017 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L Forslund, P Hjemdahl, C Held, I Bjorkander, S.V Eriksson, U Brodin, and N Rehnqvist
Prognostic implications of results from exercise testing in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris treated with metoprolol or verapamil. A report from The Angina Prognosis Study In Stockholm (APSIS)
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2000; 21(11): 901 - 910.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. N. Chatziioannou, W. H. Moore, P. V. Ford, R. E. Fisher, V.-V. Lee, C. Alfaro-Franco, and R. D. Dhekne
Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With High Exercise Tolerance
Circulation, February 23, 1999; 99(7): 867 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. J. Shaw, E. D. Peterson, L. K. Shaw, K. L. Kesler, E. R. DeLong, F. E. Harrell Jr, L. H. Muhlbaier, and D. B. Mark
Use of a Prognostic Treadmill Score in Identifying Diagnostic Coronary Disease Subgroups
Circulation, October 20, 1998; 98(16): 1622 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. L. Geleijnse, A. Elhendy, R. T. van Domburg, J. H. Cornel, R. Rambaldi, A. Salustri, A. E. M. Reijs, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and P. M. Fioretti
Cardiac Imaging for Risk Stratification With Dobutamine-Atropine Stress Testing in Patients With Chest Pain : Echocardiography, Perfusion Scintigraphy, or Both?
Circulation, July 1, 1997; 96(1): 137 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Okin, M. S. Lauer, and P. Kligfield
Chronotropic Response to Exercise: Improved Performance of ST-Segment Depression Criteria After Adjustment for Heart Rate Reserve
Circulation, December 15, 1996; 94(12): 3226 - 3231.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. M. Bodenheimer
Risk Stratification in Coronary Disease: A Contrary Viewpoint
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1992; 116(11): 927 - 936.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
A. Hamsten
Myocardial infarction at a young age: mechanisms and management
Vascular Medicine, March 1, 1991; 2(1): 45 - 60.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. D. Cheitlin
Finding the High-Risk Patient With Coronary Artery Disease
JAMA, April 15, 1988; 259(15): 2271 - 2277.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement