cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:1073-1081
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahmud, R
Right arrow Articles by Akhtar, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mahmud, R
Right arrow Articles by Akhtar, M

Functional characteristics of human macro-reentry: a study of "pre-excited" circuits by extrastimulus method

R Mahmud, PJ Tchou, ST Denker, MH Lehmann, and M Akhtar

The effect of improved conduction in areas of delay was tested during macro-reentry within the His-Purkinje system, in an attempt to separate the role of conduction delay from that of prematurity of the extrastimulus as the key determinant of reentry. Using the right ventricular extrastimulus technique (S1S2 method), both the critical His-Purkinje system delays and the zone of S1S2 intervals causing His-Purkinje system reentry were determined. Then, using a previously described technique of atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing during the basic drive, the potential site of His-Purkinje system conduction delay was (anterogradely) excited earlier (pre-excitation), as compared with the control S1S2 method. This produced a decrease in retrograde His-Purkinje system delay (S2H2), as compared with the same S1S2 interval during the control method. Changing the degree of pre-excitation at each S1S2 interval allowed for determination of the critical (or shortest) S2H2 delay necessary for His-Purkinje system reentry at each coupling interval. Of importance was the observation that the critical delay was not specific for each case but varied with the prematurity of S2. For example, the critical S2H2 delay required for reentry was actually less at shorter S1S2 intervals as compared with longer S1S2 intervals (from 206 +/- 25 to 187 +/- 20 ms, p less than 0.01). These data suggest that manifestation of reentry is a complex interplay between degree of prematurity and conduction delay. The so-called critical conduction delay can be readily modified by altering the site of block, which in turn may be dependent on prematurity of the extrastimulus.




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home