JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:1066-1072
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans: I. Safety--a comparison with routine coronary arteriography

CA Moore, ML Smucker, and S Kaul

Myocardial contrast echocardiography is a new diagnostic cardiovascular imaging technique capable of defining perfusion zones of coronary vessels in vivo; ultimately, it may be used to measure absolute regional myocardial blood flow. However, before it can be used in humans, its safety must be clearly established. Accordingly, the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic effects of intracoronary injections of 2 cc of sonicated Renografin-76 were compared with 5 to 10 cc of non-sonicated Renografin-76 in 10 subjects with normal coronary arteries. Two cubic centimeters of sonicated Renografin provides optimal myocardial opacification during echocardiography, while 5 to 10 cc of Renografin is required for an adequate coronary arteriogram. During coronary arteriography, heart rate decreased while PR and QT intervals and QRS duration increased as compared with baseline and myocardial contrast echocardiography (p less than 0.01). Similarly, the decrease in aortic pressure and first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt) was significantly (p less than 0.01) greater during routine coronary arteriography than during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar during myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary angiography. There were no significant differences in the duration of electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes between myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary arteriography. It is concluded that intracoronary injection of 2 cc of sonicated Renografin-76 provides optimal myocardial opacification. It is safe in humans, producing transient electrocardiographic and hemodynamic alterations that are less pronounced than those seen during routine coronary angiography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Kaul
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A 25-Year Retrospective
Circulation, July 15, 2008; 118(3): 291 - 308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. B. Feinstein
The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): H450 - H457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Kaul
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography : 15 Years of Research and Development
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3745 - 3760.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. Quintilio, P. Voci, F. Bilotta, G. Luzi, F. Chiarotti, M. C. Acconcia, C. Mercanti, and B. Marino
Risk factors of incomplete distribution of cardioplegic solution during coronary artery grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1995; 109(3): 439 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.