JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:836-847
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Detrano, R
Right arrow Articles by Friis, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Detrano, R
Right arrow Articles by Friis, R

Exercise electrocardiographic variables: a critical appraisal

R Detrano, E Salcedo, M Passalacqua, and R Friis

To compare four recently proposed methods of analyzing the exercise electrocardiogram with the conventional analysis of ST segment depression, 303 consecutive patients without myocardial infarction who had been referred for coronary arteriography underwent stress electrocardiography and stress thallium imaging. The specificity for the prediction of a greater than 50% coronary obstruction of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm ST segment depression measured in the conventional way was 0.59, 0.73, 0.88 and 0.94, respectively. The specificity of a thallium perfusion defect was 0.79. Sensitivities of the conventional ST depressions, thallium defect, the change in the sum of the R amplitudes and the slope adjusted for heart rate increase were calculated and compared at the cited levels of specificity. R wave changes had a significantly lower sensitivity than did the conventionally analyzed ST depression at each level of specificity. Slope-adjusted ST depression had a slightly higher sensitivity than that of conventional ST depression only at a specificity of 0.73 (0.68 versus 0.65, p = 0.07). R wave-adjusted ST depression was significantly more sensitive than conventional ST depression only at a specificity of 0.94 (0.45 versus 0.36, p = 0.01). Heart rate-adjusted ST depression was more sensitive than conventional ST depression at all of the specificities except 0.59. This pattern of superior accuracy of heart rate-adjusted ST depressions was preserved for the prediction of multivessel coronary disease. Heart rate adjustment is a simpler and more accurate modification of the conventional electrocardiographic analysis than are the other three methods studied.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Kligfield and M. S. Lauer
Exercise Electrocardiogram Testing: Beyond the ST Segment
Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2070 - 2082.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. Bigi, L. Cortigiani, D. Gregori, J. J. Bax, and C. Fiorentini
Prognostic Value of Combined Exercise and Recovery Electrocardiographic Analysis
Arch Intern Med, June 13, 2005; 165(11): 1253 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Committee Members, R. J. Gibbons, G. J. Balady, J. Timothy Bricker, B. R. Chaitman, G. F. Fletcher, V. F. Froelicher, D. B. Mark, B. D. McCallister, A. N. Mooss, et al.
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1531 - 1540.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Gibbons, G. J. Balady, J. Timothy Bricker, B. R. Chaitman, G. F. Fletcher, V. F. Froelicher, D. B. Mark, B. D. McCallister, A. N. Mooss, M. G. O'Reilly, et al.
ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines)
Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1883 - 1892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Haberl, A. Becker, A. Leber, A. Knez, C. Becker, C. Lang, R. Bruning, M. Reiser, and G. Steinbeck
Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, J. S. Douglas, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Gardin, M. A. Grunwald, D. Levy, B. W. Lytle, R. A. O'Rourke, et al.
ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2092 - 2197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. N. Chatziioannou, W. H. Moore, P. V. Ford, R. E. Fisher, V.-V. Lee, C. Alfaro-Franco, and R. D. Dhekne
Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With High Exercise Tolerance
Circulation, February 23, 1999; 99(7): 867 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Okin, R. J. Prineas, G. Grandits, P. M. Rautaharju, J. D. Cohen, R. S. Crow, and P. Kligfield
Heart Rate Adjustment of Exercise-Induced ST-Segment Depression Identifies Men Who Benefit From a Risk Factor Reduction Program
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2899 - 2904.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Okin, M. S. Lauer, and P. Kligfield
Chronotropic Response to Exercise: Improved Performance of ST-Segment Depression Criteria After Adjustment for Heart Rate Reserve
Circulation, December 15, 1996; 94(12): 3226 - 3231.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.