JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:327-332
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorian, P
Right arrow Articles by Winkle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorian, P
Right arrow Articles by Winkle, R.

Lidocaine causes a reversible, concentration-dependent increase in defibrillation energy requirements

P Dorian, ES Fain, JM Davy, and RA Winkle

To investigate the influence of lidocaine on the energy requirements for internal defibrillation, lidocaine (n = 8) or saline solution (n = 12) was administered by intravenous infusion to 20 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs, and the likelihood of successful defibrillation was examined at various shock energy levels before and after treatment. After lidocaine administration to a mean steady state concentration of 5.6 +/- 2.7 micrograms/ml, the mean energy required to achieve 50 and 90% success in defibrillation (E50 and E90) increased by 61.1 +/- 34.1% (mean +/- SD, p less than 0.005) and 47.1 +/- 28.6% (p less than 0.005), respectively. The steady state log lidocaine concentration correlated positively with the observed increase in E50 (r = 0.887, p less than 0.01) over a concentration range from 1.95 to 9.8 micrograms/ml. In a related experiment, lidocaine infusion was administered to five dogs and then abruptly discontinued. At energy levels achieving a mean 90.0 +/- 10.0% success in defibrillation before treatment, only 43.3 +/- 23.4% success was achieved after 60 minutes of the lidocaine infusion (p less than 0.01) at a mean plasma concentration of 8.4 +/- 2.1 micrograms/ml. The percent of successful defibrillations returned to baseline value (92.0 +/- 18.0%, p less than 0.01) after drug washout at a time when mean lidocaine concentration had declined to 1.8 +/- 0.5 microgram/ml. Lidocaine causes a reversible, concentration-dependent increase in the energy requirements for successful defibrillation; recommendations to administer lidocaine to patients with ventricular fibrillation resistant to defibrillation may need to be reviewed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
J.-q. Zhong, G. Laurent, P. P.-S. So, Xudong Hu, J. K. Hennan, and P. Dorian
Effects of Rotigaptide, a Gap Junction Modifier, on Defibrillation Energy and Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest in Rabbits
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2007; 12(1): 69 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Dorian, D. Cass, B. Schwartz, R. Cooper, R. Gelaznikas, and A. Barr
Amiodarone as Compared with Lidocaine for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
N. Engl. J. Med., March 21, 2002; 346(12): 884 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
A. Hamzei, T. Ohara, Y.-H. Kim, M.-H. Lee, O. Voroshilovski, S.-F. Lin, J. N. Weiss, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian
The Role of Approximate Entropy in Predicting Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2002; 7(1): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L.-P. Lai, J.-L. Lin, W.-P. Lien, Y.-Z. Tseng, and S. K. S. Huang
Intravenous sotalol decreases transthoracic cardioversion energy requirement for chronic atrial fibrillation in humans: assessment of the electrophysiological effects by biatrial basket electrodes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1434 - 1441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. A. Ewy and J. P. Ornato
Emergency cardiac care: introduction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2000; 35(4): 825 - 880.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. J. Kudenchuk, L. A. Cobb, M. K. Copass, R. O. Cummins, A. M. Doherty, C. E. Fahrenbruch, A. P. Hallstrom, W. A. Murray, M. Olsufka, and T. Walsh
Amiodarone for Resuscitation after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Fibrillation
N. Engl. J. Med., September 16, 1999; 341(12): 871 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A A J Adgey and P W Johnston
Approaches to modern management of cardiac arrest
Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 397 - 401.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
D A Chamberlain
Antiarrhythmic drugs in resuscitation
Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 408 - 411.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
Advanced Life Support Working Group of the Europea
The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support
BMJ, June 20, 1998; 316(7148): 1863 - 1869.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. R. Ujhelyi, J. J. Sims, and A. W. Miller
High-dose lidocaine does not affect defibrillation efficacy: implications for defibrillation mechanisms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 1998; 274(4): H1113 - H1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. R. Ujhelyi, M. Schur, T. Frede, M. Gabel, and M. L. Markel
Differential Effects of Lidocaine on Defibrillation Threshold With Monophasic Versus Biphasic Shock Waveforms
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1644 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Roden
Risks and Benefits of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 22, 1994; 331(12): 785 - 791.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.