JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8:267-273
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ameisen, O
Right arrow Articles by Borer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ameisen, O
Right arrow Articles by Borer, J.

Effects of recent and remote infarction on the predictive accuracy of the ST segment/heart rate slope

O Ameisen, P Kligfield, PM Okin, DH Miller, and JS Borer

The exercise electrocardiographic ST segment/heart rate slope accurately identifies three vessel coronary disease in patients with stable angina, but the method is less accurate in predischarge testing after recent myocardial infarction. To assess the effect of both recent (less than 3 weeks) infarction and remote (greater than 8 weeks) Q wave infarction on the ST segment/heart rate slope, the predictive value of a slope greater than 6.0 microV/beat per min for the identification of three vessel coronary artery disease was evaluated in 113 patients. The 58 patients with stable angina, including 17 with remote Q wave myocardial infarction, were similar to the 55 patients with recent myocardial infarction with respect to age and peak exercise heart rate. In patients with stable angina and no prior Q wave myocardial infarction, an ST segment/heart rate slope greater than 6.0 had a sensitivity of 92% (11 of 12), a specificity of 97% (28 of 29) and a positive predictive value of 92% (11 of 12) for three vessel coronary artery disease. In patients with stable angina and remote Q wave infarction, sensitivity was 83% (5 of 6), specificity was 91% (10 of 11) and positive predictive value was 83% (5 of 6). After recent infarction, test specificity for three vessel disease was preserved at 95% (39 of 41), but test sensitivity was poor (3 of 8). This was confirmed by evaluation of six additional recent patients with infarction and three vessel disease. Among the combined group with recent infarction, test sensitivity for three vessel disease was only 29% (4 of 14), significantly lower than in patients with stable angina (p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.