JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:1131-1139
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Myerburg, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, K.
Right arrow Articles by Myerburg, R.

Procainamide pharmacokinetics in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure

KM Kessler, DS Kayden, DM Estes, PL Koslovskis, R Sequeira, RG Trohman, AR Palomo, and RJ Myerburg

Abnormal procainamide pharmacokinetics (prolonged half-life and decreased volume of distribution) and pharmacodynamics (decreased threshold for the suppression of premature ventricular complexes) have been suggested in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, or both. To better define procainamide kinetics, 37 patients in the acute care setting received intravenous procainamide (25 mg/min, median dose 750 mg) with peak and hourly blood samples taken over 6 hours. Compared with the 10 control patients, the 12 patients with acute myocardial infarction and the 15 patients with congestive heart failure had normal procainamide pharmacokinetics with respect to half-life (2.3 +/- 1.0, 2.5 +/- 0.9 and 2.6 +/- 0.8 hours, respectively), volume of distribution (1.9 +/- 0.7, 1.8 +/- 0.4 and 1.8 +/- 0.5 liters/kg, respectively), clearance (11.3 +/- 7.5, 9.3 +/- 3.6 and 9.1 +/- 3.5 ml/min per kg, respectively) and unbound drug fraction (66 +/- 9, 66 +/- 9 and 69 +/- 4%, respectively). Low thresholds for greater than 85% premature ventricular complex suppression were confirmed in these patients (median 4.7 micrograms/ml in patients with acute myocardial infarction and 3.3 micrograms/ml in patients with congestive heart failure). Thus, differences in the response of premature ventricular complexes to procainamide reflect electropharmacologic differences dependent on clinical setting rather than pharmacokinetic abnormalities. Furthermore, the reduction of procainamide dosing in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, based solely on prior kinetic data, may result in inappropriate antiarrhythmic therapy.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.