cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:1028-1035
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nanas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nanas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, D.

Comparison of an implanted abdominal aortic counterpulsation device with the intraaortic balloon pump in a heart failure model

JN Nanas, JW Mason, Y Taenaka, and DB Olsen

The abdominal aortic counterpulsation device is a round pumping chamber with a valveless opening which is implanted retroperitoneally on the abdominal aorta. The Utah driver is connected to the device through an air conduit and is synchronized on the electrocardiographic signal to provide diastolic aortic augmentation. For comparison an intraaortic balloon was also driven by the Utah driver system. The abdominal aortic counterpulsation device (stroke volume = 30, 40 and 60 ml) and the intraaortic balloon pump (balloon volume = 20 ml) were tested in dogs with acute left ventricular failure. The abdominal aortic counterpulsation device was also tested in normal animals. In acute left ventricular failure the abdominal aortic counterpulsation device at a stroke volume of 30, 40 or 60 ml decreased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by an average of 28.56 (p less than 0.001), 39.56 (p less than 0.001) and 44.14% (p less than 0.005), respectively; aortic end-diastolic pressure by 24.11 (p less than 0.001), 26.67 (p less than 0.001) and 19.57% (p less than 0.01); and aortic systolic pressure by 18.56 (p less than 0.002), 26.0 (p less than 0.001) and 22.43% (p less than 0.005). It increased cardiac index by 27.58 (p less than 0.02), 35.59 (p less than 0.005) and 43.42% (p less than 0.001) and it provided peak aortic diastolic augmentation of 64.5 (p less than 0.001), 69.78 (p less than 0.001) and 74.43% (p less than 0.001), respectively, above the control aortic end-diastolic pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. N. Nanas, C. T. Lolas, C. E. Charitos, S. N. Nanas, Z. J. Margari, E. V. Agapitos, and S. D. Moulopoulos
A VAVLELESS HIGH STROKE VOLUME COUNTERPULSATION DEVICE RESTORES HEMODYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND INTRACTABLE CARDIOGENIC SHOCK AWAITING HEART TRANSPLANTATION
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 55 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
J. N. Nanas, M. Anastasiou-Nana, and S. D. Moulopoulos
Experimental and Clinical Evaluation of a Counterpulsation Device
J Biomater Appl, April 1, 1990; 4(4): 362 - 373.
[Abstract]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home