Intracavitary electrode catheter cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the dog

This study examined factors determining efficacy of intracavitary cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias in closed chest, anesthetized dogs with talc pericarditis. Electrode catheters were positioned transvenously with the cathode in the right atrial appendage. In Group 1 dogs (n = 6), three anode sites (superior and inferior venae cavae ostia and mid-right atrium) were tested with graded energy shocks to determine the lowest effective cardioversion energy at each anode position. In Group 2 dogs (n = 9), multiple cardioversion attempts with energy levels of 0.01 to 5.0 J were used to evaluate reproducibility of energy thresholds. In Group 3 dogs (n = 6) without talc-induced pericarditis, atrial pathologic study was done after five intracavitary shocks (0.5 or 5.0 J). In Group 1, cardioversion was achieved with 0.75 J or less with no significant difference in minimal effective cardioversion energies among the three anode positions tested. In Group 2, 98 (26%) of 372 cardioversion attempts were successful. Intra-animal minimal effective cardioversion energies varied widely, and timing of shocks relative to atrial electrograms did not influence efficacy. Complications were infrequent and included delayed sinus rhythm recovery, transient atrioventricular block and ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 9 (2.4%) of 372 shocks, and was associated with higher delivered energies (6 of 9 with greater than or equal to 1.0 J) and with shocks delivered 116 to 180 ms after onset of the QRS complex. In Group 3, two dogs had no histologic damage, three dogs had multiple small foci of subendocardial necrosis and in one dog these foci coalesced to involve half the atrial wall thickness. Thus, low energy cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias is feasible using intracavitary electrodes. Synchronization of energy delivery to the QRS complex is important to minimize risk of ventricular fibrillation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Boriani, M. Biffi, V. Cervi, G. Bronzetti, G. Magagnoli, R. Zannoli, and A. Branzi Evaluation of Myocardial Injury Following Repeated Internal Atrial Shocks by Monitoring Serum Cardiac Troponin I Levels Chest, August 1, 2000; 118(2): 342 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Gray and J. Jalife Effects of Atrial Defibrillation Shocks on the Ventricles in Isolated Sheep Hearts Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1613 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. T. Keelan, D. Krum, J. Hare, K. Mughal, H. Li, M. Akhtar, and M. R. Jazayeri Safety of Atrial Defibrillation Shocks Synchronized to Narrow and Wide QRS Complexes During Atrial Pacing Protocols Simulating Atrial Fibrillation in Dogs Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 2022 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. C. Sokoloski, G. M. Ayers, K. Kumagai, C. M. Khrestian, S. Niwano, and A. L. Waldo Safety of Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation : Studies in the Canine Sterile Pericarditis Model Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1343 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. A. Gray, G. Ayers, and J. Jalife Video Imaging of Atrial Defibrillation in the Sheep Heart Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 1038 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text]