Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:925-932
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alpert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krol, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alpert, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krol, R.

Comparative survival after permanent ventricular and dual chamber pacing for patients with chronic high degree atrioventricular block with and without preexistent congestive heart failure

MA Alpert, JJ Curtis, JF Sanfelippo, GC Flaker, JT Walls, V Mukerji, D Villarreal, SK Katti, NP Madigan, and RB Krol

To determine whether survival after permanent ventricular demand (VVI) pacing differs from survival after permanent dual chamber (DVI or DDD) pacing in patients with chronic high degree atrioventricular (AV) block (Mobitz type II or trifascicular block), 132 patients who received a VVI pacemaker (Group 1) and 48 patients who received a DVI or DDD pacemaker (Group 2) were followed up for 1 to 5 years. There was no significant difference in sex distribution, mean age or incidence of coronary heart disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke or renal failure between Groups 1 and 2. Overall, the predicted cumulative survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 89, 76 and 73%, respectively, for Group 1 and 95, 82 and 70%, respectively, for Group 2. In patients with preexistent congestive heart failure, the predicted cumulative survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 85, 66 and 47%, respectively, for Group 1 (n = 53) and 94, 81 and 69%, respectively, for Group 2 (n = 20). The 5 year predicted cumulative survival rate was significantly lower in Group 1 patients with preexistent congestive heart failure than in Group 2 patients with the same condition (p less than 0.02). There was no significant difference in 5 year cumulative survival rate between Groups 1 and 2 for patients without preexistent congestive heart failure. The results suggest that permanent dual chamber pacing enhances survival to a greater extent than does permanent ventricular demand pacing in patients with high degree AV block and preexistent congestive heart failure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.J Hoijer, J Brandt, R Willenheimer, S Juul-Moller, and P.-A Bostrom
Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2002; 23(6): 490 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. R. Pyatt, J. D. Somauroo, M. Jackson, A. D. Grayson, S. Osula, R. K. Aggarwal, R. G. Charles, and D. T. Connelly
Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation: analysis of predictors for increased mortality
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(2): 113 - 119.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chro, W. J. Remme, and K. Swedberg
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2001; 22(17): 1527 - 1560.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
U.K.H Wiegand, J Potratz, F Bode, R Schreiber, H Bonnemeier, W Peters, and H.A Katus
Cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemaker therapy: does single lead VDD pacing reduce treatment costs of atrioventricular block?
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2001; 22(2): 174 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A Eltrafi, P Currie, and J H Silas
Permanent pacemaker insertion in a district general hospital: indications, patient characteristics, and complications
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2000; 76(896): 337 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
Z.I. Harris and M.D. Gammage
Alternative right ventricular pacing sites -- where are we going?
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 93 - 98.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Jahangir, W.-K. Shen, S. A. Neubauer, D. J. Ballard, S. C. Hammill, D. O. Hodge, C. M. Lohse, B. J. Gersh, and D. L. Hayes
Relation between mode of pacing and long-term survival in the very elderly
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1208 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. Brandt, C.J. Hoijer, P. Wierup, S. Juul-Moller, and P.-A Bostrom
Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation: Feasibility and intermediate term follow-up
Europace, January 1, 1999; 1(3): 168 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. W. Lewis Jr., C. R. Webb, S. D. Pickard, J. Lehman, and G. Jacobsen
The increased need for a permanent pacemaker after reoperative cardiac surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1998; 116(1): 74 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Ovadia, K. Gear, D. Thoele, and F. I. Marcus
Accelerometer Systolic Time Intervals as Fast-Response Sensors of Upright Posture in the Young
Circulation, October 1, 1995; 92(7): 1849 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. A. Lamas, C. L. Pashos, S.-L. T. Normand, and B. McNeil
Permanent Pacemaker Selection and Subsequent Survival in Elderly Medicare Pacemaker Recipients
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1063 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement