JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:383-392
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S
Right arrow Articles by Weyman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S
Right arrow Articles by Weyman, A.

Contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia. III. An in vivo comparison of the extent of abnormal wall motion with the area at risk for necrosis

S Kaul, NG Pandian, LD Gillam, JB Newell, RD Okada, and AE Weyman

To define the in vivo relation between abnormal wall motion and the area at risk for necrosis after acute coronary occlusion, 11 open chest dogs were studied. Five dogs underwent left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and six underwent left circumflex artery occlusion. Area at risk was defined at five short-axis levels (mitral valve, chordal, high and low papillary muscle and apex) using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Wall motion was measured in the cycles preceding injection of contrast medium. Two observers used two different methods to measure wall motion. In method A, end-diastolic to end-systolic fractional radial change for each of 32 endocardial targets was determined. The extent of abnormal wall motion was then calculated using three definitions of wall motion abnormality: akinesia/dyskinesia, fractional inward endocardial excursion of less than 10%, and fractional inward endocardial excursion of less than 20%. In method B, the information from the entire systolic contraction sequence was analyzed and correlated with a normal contraction pattern. The best linear correlation between area at risk (AR) and abnormal wall motion (AWM) was achieved using method B and expressed by the following linear regression: AWM = 0.92 AR + 3.0 (r = 0.92, p less than 0.0001, SEE = 1.7%). Of the three definitions of abnormality used in method A, the best correlation was achieved between area at risk and less than 10% inward endocardial excursion and was expressed by the following polynomial regression: AWM = -0.01 AR2 + 1.5 AR -0.14 (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001, SEE = 1.7%). These data demonstrate that there is a definite relation between area at risk and abnormal wall motion but that this relation varies depending on the method used to analyze wall motion. However, wall motion during acute ischemia is also influenced by the loading conditions of the heart. Because these may vary in a manner that is independent of the ischemic process, measurement of both risk area and abnormal motion may provide a more comprehensive assessment of cardiac function in myocardial ischemia than is provided by the measurement of either alone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Kaul
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A 25-Year Retrospective
Circulation, July 15, 2008; 118(3): 291 - 308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. Nishino, H.-J. Youn, D. Gheorghevici, C. Zellner, T. M. Chou, K. Sudhir, and R. F. Redberg
Effect of Intracoronary Estradiol on Postischemic Microvascular Damage in a Porcine Model: A Myocardial Contrast Echocardiographic Study
Angiology, November 1, 2003; 54(6): 701 - 709.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L. Paluszkiewicz, P. Kwinecki, M. Jemielity, A. Szyszka, W. Dyszkiewicz, and A. Cieslinski
Myocardial perfusion correlates with improvement of systolic function of the left ventricle after CABG. Dobutamine echocardiography and Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT study
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 21(1): 32 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
F. F. Immer, A. M. Seiler, B. C. Aeschbacher, F. Mahler, H. Saner, and H. Saner
Influence of the Ultrasound Contrast Agent Levovist(R) on Human Nailfold Capillary Microcirculation
Angiology, February 1, 2000; 51(2): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Kaul
Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography : 15 Years of Research and Development
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3745 - 3760.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Leong-Poi, S.-J. Rim, D. E. Le, N. G. Fisher, K. Wei, and S. Kaul
Perfusion Versus Function: The Ischemic Cascade in Demand Ischemia: Implications of Single-Vessel Versus Multivessel Stenosis
Circulation, February 26, 2002; 105(8): 987 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.