JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:251-269
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klimt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klimt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, P

Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study. Part II. Secondary coronary prevention with persantine and aspirin

CR Klimt, GL Knatterud, J Stamler, and P Meier

In the Persantine-Aspirin Reinfarction Study, Part II (PARIS II), 3,128 persons who had recovered from myocardial infarction, suffered from 4 weeks to 4 months previously, were randomized into two groups: dipyridamole (Persantine) plus aspirin (n = 1,563) and placebo (n = 1,565). The average length of follow-up was 23.4 months. Prespecified primary end points were coronary incidence (definite nonfatal myocardial infarction plus death due to recent or acute cardiac event), coronary mortality (death due to recent or acute cardiac event) and total mortality, each at 1 year of patient follow-up and at the end of the study. Coronary incidence in the Persantine plus aspirin group was significantly lower than in the placebo group, both at 1 year (30% reduction) and at the end of the study (24% reduction). The statistically significant differences in coronary incidence, at 1 year and at the end of the study, in favor of the combination treatment remained after adjustment for multiple baseline variables and adjustment for multiple testing (three end points for two time periods). Although there were reductions for other end points, these differences were not statistically significant. Coronary mortality was 20% lower in the Persantine plus aspirin group compared with the placebo group at 1 year, and 6% lower overall. Total mortality in the treated group compared with the placebo group was 11% lower at 1 year and 3% lower overall. The reduced rates of coronary incidence largely reflected lower rates of definite nonfatal myocardial infarction in the Persantine plus aspirin group. Several subgroups were defined a priori and at the end of the study. The beneficial effect of Persantine plus aspirin compared with placebo for coronary incidence tended to be greater for the following groups of patients: those who had a non-Q wave infarct; those who were not taking digitalis; those who were receiving beta-receptor blocking drugs at baseline; those who were in New York Heart Association functional class I; those who had had only one myocardial infarction; or those who were enrolled in the study early, that is within 85 days of the qualifying myocardial infarction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. A. Meadows and D. L. Bhatt
Clinical Aspects of Platelet Inhibitors and Thrombus Formation
Circ. Res., May 11, 2007; 100(9): 1261 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. M. Massie
Aspirin Use in Chronic Heart Failure: What Should We Recommend to the Practitioner?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 20, 2005; 46(6): 963 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
K Dubey, D K Balani, and K K Pillai
Potential adverse interaction between aspirin and Lisinopril in hypertensive rats
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2003; 22(3): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Hurlen, M. Abdelnoor, P. Smith, J. Erikssen, and H. Arnesen
Warfarin, Aspirin, or Both after Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., September 26, 2002; 347(13): 969 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
G.Y.H. Lip and C.R. Gibbs
Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm: a Cochrane systematic review
QJM, July 1, 2002; 95(7): 461 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
J. G F Cleland, J. John, J. Dhawan, and A. Clark
What is the optimal medical management of ischaemic heart failure?
Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 135 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. A. Cairns, P. Theroux, H. D. Lewis Jr., M. Ezekowitz, and T. W. Meade
Antithrombotic Agents in Coronary Artery Disease
Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1_suppl): 228S - 252S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Hall
The aspirin-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor tradeoff: to halve and halve not
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1808 - 1812.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
T. Stys, W. E. Lawson, G. C. Smaldone, and A. Stys
Does Aspirin Attenuate the Beneficial Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition in Heart Failure?
Arch Intern Med, May 22, 2000; 160(10): 1409 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. W. Albers
Choice of endpoints in antiplatelet trials: Which outcomes are most relevant to stroke patients?
Neurology, March 14, 2000; 54(5): 1022 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. L. Wilterdink and J. D. Easton
Dipyridamole Plus Aspirin in Cerebrovascular Disease
Arch Neurol, September 1, 1999; 56(9): 1087 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. He, P. K. Whelton, B. Vu, and M. J. Klag
Aspirin and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
JAMA, December 9, 1998; 280(22): 1930 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Eccles, N. Freemantle, J. Mason, and t. N. o. E. A. G. D. Group
North of England evidence based guideline development project: guideline on the use of aspirin as secondary prophylaxis for vascular disease in primary care
BMJ, April 25, 1998; 316(7140): 1303 - 1309.
[Full Text]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
S. Kaplan, A. Kaplan, K. F. Marcoe, W. P. Hammond, L. D. Fisher, and L. R. Sauvage
Citric Acid Enhances the Antithrombotic Effect of Aspirin in Many Aspirin-Resistant Subjects
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 1997; 3(1): 54 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. P. De La Cruz, A. Moreno, M. Muñoz, J. M. G. Campos, and F. S. De La Cuesta
Effect of Aspirin Plus Dipyridamole on the Retinal Vascular Pattern in Experimental Diabetes Mellitus
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 1997; 280(1): 454 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. J. Weiss, P. F. Bray, M. Tayback, S. P. Schulman, T. S. Kickler, L. C. Becker, J. L. Weiss, G. Gerstenblith, and P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont
A Polymorphism of a Platelet Glycoprotein Receptor as an Inherited Risk Factor for Coronary Thrombosis
N. Engl. J. Med., April 25, 1996; 334(17): 1090 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Antiplatelet Trialists
Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients
BMJ, January 8, 1994; 308(6921): 81 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H.W. Heiss, H. Just, D. Middleton, and G. Deichsel
Reocclusion Prophylaxis with Dipyridamole Combined with Acetylsalicylic Acid Following PTA
Angiology, April 1, 1990; 41(4): 263 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.