cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:68-73
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y
Right arrow Articles by Kawai, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y
Right arrow Articles by Kawai, C

Myocardial relaxation in atrial fibrillation

Y Nakamura, T Konishi, H Nonogi, T Sakurai, S Sasayama, and C Kawai

Although myocardial contractility has been known to vary from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation, myocardial relaxation in this arrhythmia has not been investigated. In this study, left ventricular relaxation was examined in seven patients with atrial fibrillation (four with mitral valve disease, one with aortic regurgitation, one with secundum type atrial septal defect and one with apical left ventricular hypertrophy). The left ventricular pressure was measured with a micromanometer-tipped catheter and the time constant of isovolumic left ventricular pressure decline (the relaxation time constant) was calculated by means of exponential curve fitting from more than 20 consecutive beats in each patient. The maximal rate of rise of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt) and the relaxation time constant were examined in relation to the preceding RR interval (RR2) and to the ratio of the RR2 interval to the pre-preceding RR interval (RR2/RR1), and the correlation coefficients were obtained. The dP/dt correlated better with RR2/RR1 than with the RR2 interval (0.82 +/- 0.05 versus 0.48 +/- 0.2), but the relaxation time constant did not show any correlation with RR2/RR1 or the RR2 interval (0.03 +/- 0.21 and 0.06 +/- 0.21, respectively). The relaxation time constant was fairly constant in each patient even when the RR2 interval and RR2/RR1 varied greatly. Thus, relaxation in atrial fibrillation is independent of changes in contractility as seen in the relation between postextrasystolic relaxation and postextrasystolic potentiation of contractility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Tabata, R. A. Grimm, J. Asada, Z. B. Popovic, H. Yamada, N. L. Greenberg, D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, et al.
Determinants of LV diastolic function during atrial fibrillation: beat-to-beat analysis in acute dog experiments
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H145 - H152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Tabata, R. A. Grimm, N. L. Greenberg, D. A. Agler, K. A. Mowrey, D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, T. N. Mazgalev, and J. D. Thomas
Assessment of LV systolic function in atrial fibrillation using an index of preceding cardiac cycles
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H573 - H580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home