JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:142-147
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torres, V
Right arrow Articles by Somberg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torres, V
Right arrow Articles by Somberg, J.

QT prolongation and the antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone

V Torres, D Tepper, D Flowers, J Wynn, S Lam, D Keefe, DS Miura, and JC Somberg

Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic agent known to cause prolongation of action potential duration which is reflected in the electrocardiogram as a prolongation of the QT interval. Prolongation of the QT interval in patients dying suddenly was compared with that in patients who remained alive to determine whether a difference existed between these two groups. The electrocardiogram and amiodarone levels were evaluated in 33 patients who presented with cardiac arrest and symptomatic ventricular tachycardia in whom no other antiarrhythmic agent was found effective in preventing induction of ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiologic studies. There were 30 men and 3 women (mean age 52 +/- 10 years). Twenty-three are alive after a mean follow-up period of 12 +/- 7 months. Ten died: six suddenly, three of non-cardiac causes and one of congestive heart failure. Using a two-way analysis of variance, the percent change in QT, QTc, JT and JTc intervals before and after amiodarone therapy was analyzed. Marked prolongation in the QT interval was present in patients who remained alive with amiodarone therapy. A significant difference in percent QT prolongation was seen between the latter patients and those who died suddenly (p less than 0.005). No difference was observed in the percent change in QRS interval between the two groups. The levels of amiodarone (2.5 versus 3.2 micrograms/ml) and its metabolite (desethylamiodarone) were not significantly different between the living patients and those who died suddenly. These findings suggest that a prolongation of the QT interval may be a marker for the therapeutic antiarrhythmic effect of amiodarone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. N. Nanas and J. W. Mason
Pharmacokinetics and Regional Electrophysiological Effects of Intracoronary Amiodarone Administration
Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 451 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.