JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 7:1-8
© 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lichstein, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lichstein, E

Effect of propranolol in patients with myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmia

LM Friedman, RP Byington, RJ Capone, CD Furberg, S Goldstein, and E Lichstein

The Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of the long-term administration of propranolol hydrochloride to patients who had had at least one myocardial infarction. Among 3,837 patients followed up for an average of 25 months, 3,290 (85.7%) had 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiograms performed at the baseline examination. Four classifications of arrhythmia were examined. One of these, the presence of complex ventricular arrhythmias (at least 10 ventricular premature beats/h, or at least one pair or run of ventricular premature beats or multiform ventricular premature beats) was the subgroup of major interest. Regardless of the classification, the presence of arrhythmia identifies a group of patients with a higher risk of total mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, sudden cardiac death and instantaneous cardiac death. The a priori subgroup hypothesis that sudden death would be preferentially reduced by propranolol in patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias was not supported. The relative benefit of propranolol in reducing sudden death for this subgroup was 28 versus 16% for the subgroup without ventricular arrhythmia (relative risk of 0.72 versus 0.84, a nonsignificant relative difference of 14%). There were similar findings for two of the three other classifications of arrhythmia and for the other response variables. Although propranolol does not appear to be of special relative benefit in patients with ventricular arrhythmia, the presence of the arrhythmia does identify a high-risk group. The mechanism by which propranolol reduces mortality is still unclear, but is probably not solely an antiarrhythmic one.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. McMurray, L. Kober, M. Robertson, H. Dargie, W. Colucci, J. Lopez-Sendon, W. Remme, D. N. Sharpe, and I. Ford
Antiarrhythmic effect of carvedilol after acute myocardial infarction: Results of the Carvedilol Post-Infarct Survival Control in Left Ventricular Dysfunction (CAPRICORN) trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 15, 2005; 45(4): 525 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
W. S. Aronow
Management of the Elderly Person After Myocardial Infarction
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2004; 59(11): 1173 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. C. Sanguinetti and P. B. Bennett
Antiarrhythmic Drug Target Choices and Screening
Circ. Res., September 19, 2003; 93(6): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. J Myerburg and P. M Spooner
Opportunities for sudden death prevention: Directions for new clinical and basic research
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 177 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Pratt and L. A. Moye
The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial : Casting Suppression in a Different Light
Circulation, January 1, 1995; 91(1): 245 - 247.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. M. Roden
Risks and Benefits of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., September 22, 1994; 331(12): 785 - 791.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1986 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.