cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 6:1273-1279
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Sendon, J
Right arrow Articles by Gamallo, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Sendon, J
Right arrow Articles by Gamallo, C

Electrocardiographic findings in acute right ventricular infarction: sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic alterations in right precordial leads V4R, V3R, V1, V2, and V3

J Lopez-Sendon, I Coma-Canella, S Alcasena, J Seoane, and C Gamallo

To determine the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and diagnostic efficiency of electrocardiographic alterations in the diagnosis of acute right ventricular infarction, 43 autopsy patients with acute myocardial infarction and an electrocardiogram including 12 leads plus leads V3R and V4R were studied. Group A included 21 patients with right ventricular infarction, of whom 14 (group AI) had posterior and 7 (group AII) had anterior right ventricular infarction. Group B included 22 patients without right ventricular infarction. Excluding group AII patients, the sensitivity of the presence of a Q wave reached 78.6% in lead V4R and decreased in leads V1 to V3; its specificity was low in all the leads. The sensitivity of ST segment elevation reached 100% in lead V4R and decreased in leads V1 to V3; its specificity was highest (68.2%) in leads V4R and V3R, its negative predictive value was 100% and its diagnostic efficiency was 80.6%. The criterion of ST segment elevation in lead V4R being higher than that in leads V1 to V3 was less sensitive (78.6%) than ST segment elevation in lead V4R alone, but its specificity reached 100%, its positive predictive value 100% and its diagnostic efficiency 91.7%. In conclusion, there are no electrocardiographic criteria to identify anterior right ventricular necrosis, but posterior right ventricular necrosis may be identified by the presence of a Q wave or ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads, reaching the highest sensitivity and specificity in lead V4R. The criterion of ST segment elevation in lead V4R being higher than that in leads V1 to V3 offers the highest specificity and efficiency in the diagnosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, and on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force
Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 27, 2007; 50(22): 2173 - 2195.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force, TASK FORCE MEMBERS: Chairpersons: Kristian Thygese, Biomarker Group: Allan S. Jaffe, Coordinator (USA), ECG Group: Bernard Chaitman, Co-ordinator (USA), P, Imaging Group: Richard Underwood, Coordinator (UK), Intervention Group: Jean-Pierre Bassand, Co-ordina, Clinical Investigation Group: Paul W. Armstrong, C, et al.
Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 27, 2007; 116(22): 2634 - 2653.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Task Force Members, K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, Biomarker Group, A. S. Jaffe, F. S. Apple, M. Galvani, H. A. Katus, L. K. Newby, et al.
Universal definition of myocardial infarction: Kristian Thygesen, Joseph S. Alpert and Harvey D. White on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2525 - 2538.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Kligfield, L. S. Gettes, J. J. Bailey, R. Childers, B. J. Deal, E. W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J. A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D. M. Mirvis, et al.
Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1109 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Kligfield, L. S. Gettes, J. J. Bailey, R. Childers, B. J. Deal, E. W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J. A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D. M. Mirvis, et al.
Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology
Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1306 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
Y Birnbaum and B J Drew
The electrocardiogram in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: correlation with coronary anatomy and prognosis
Postgrad. Med. J., September 1, 2003; 79(935): 490 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. J. Zimetbaum and M. E. Josephson
Use of the Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., March 6, 2003; 348(10): 933 - 940.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
K. Y. Chang, R. Ebrahimi, and M. M. Bersohn
Ventricular Fibrillation Resulting from Acute Right Ventricular Infarction from Isolated Occlusion of a Right Ventricular Branch Artery
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1): 5 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
R. Carroll, N. Sharma, A. Butt, and K.M.A. Hussain
Unusual Electrocardiographic Presentation of an Isolated Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Thrombotic Occlusion of a Non-dominant Right Coronary Artery: A Case Report and Brief Review of Literature
Angiology, January 1, 2003; 54(1): 119 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.-K. Wong and H. D. White
Risk stratification of patients with right ventricular infarction: is there a need for a specific risk score?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2002; 23(21): 1642 - 1645.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Logeart, D. Himbert, and A. Cohen-Solal
ST-Segment Elevation in Precordial Leads* : Anterior or Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction?
Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1): 290 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. W. Kinch and T. J. Ryan
Right Ventricular Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., April 28, 1994; 330(17): 1211 - 1217.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Zehender, W. Kasper, E. Kauder, M. Schonthaler, A. Geibel, M. Olschewski, and H. Just
Right Ventricular Infarction as an Independent Predictor of Prognosis after Acute Inferior Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., April 8, 1993; 328(14): 981 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home