Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 6:1073-1077
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talit, U
Right arrow Articles by Laniado, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Talit, U
Right arrow Articles by Laniado, S

Pharmacokinetic differences between peripheral and central drug administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

U Talit, S Braun, H Halkin, B Shargorodsky, and S Laniado

Advanced resuscitation techniques are dependent on drug therapy to increase survival. Because drugs must reach their site of action instantaneously, the choice of appropriate route of administration may be critical. To study the pharmacokinetics of drug administration by peripheral and central venous routes during resuscitation, nine mongrel dogs were studied. Arterial blood pressure and electrocardiograms were monitored continuously. Cardiac output was evaluated before resuscitation to determine control levels. After thoracotomy and fibrillation of the heart, cardiac massage was started with a frequency of compression maintained at 60/min. Bolus injections of two different radioisotopes were given simultaneously through a peripheral and a central vein. Isotope activity was sampled through a catheter in the right femoral artery at 5 second intervals for 90 seconds and at 30 second intervals for 210 seconds. The major differences between the two routes of administration were that central injection produced a 270% higher peak concentration (p less than 0.001) and significantly shorter lag times to the first appearance of tracer (16 +/- 7 versus 38 +/- 13 seconds, p less than 0.05) and times to peak concentration (13 +/- 5 versus 27 +/- 12 seconds, p less than 0.01). In contrast, there were no significant differences in area under the time-counts curve, mean residence time, total body clearance and steady state volume of distribution. The central compartment volume of distribution was significantly smaller after central than after peripheral injection (26.1 +/- 56 versus 76.3 +/- 16.5 ml, p less than 0.01). The therapeutic implications of these findings must be investigated for individual drugs used during cardiorespiratory resuscitation to determine the most appropriate route and dosage for each agent.




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement