Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 6:814-821
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naccarelli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prystowsky, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naccarelli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Prystowsky, E.

Amiodarone: risk factors for recurrence of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia identified at electrophysiologic study

GV Naccarelli, NS Fineberg, DP Zipes, JJ Heger, G Duncan, and EN Prystowsky

Ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation during amiodarone therapy often does not preclude a good clinical response. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of discriminant analysis could distinguish patients who remained asymptomatic from those who subsequently developed symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or cardiac arrest. Studies were performed in 37 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia who still had ventricular tachycardia induced during programmed electrical stimulation during amiodarone therapy. The mean follow-up time was 14.1 +/- 1.3 months (+/- SEM). Twenty-three patients remained asymptomatic, whereas 14 patients had symptomatic recurrence of their ventricular tachycardia. In patients with recurrence of arrhythmia compared with asymptomatic patients, administration of amiodarone caused a longer ventricular effective refractory period (296 +/- 8 versus 271 +/- 7 ms, p less than 0.05) and a greater change in corrected QT [QTc] interval (90 +/- 18 versus 44 +/- 9 ms, p less than 0.02), but no difference in the decrease in premature ventricular complexes after treatment with amiodarone. During amiodarone therapy, nonbundle branch reentrant repetitive ventricular responses were induced by a single ventricular extrastimulus during sinus rhythm in 9 of 14 patients with recurrent arrhythmias compared with 2 of 21 asymptomatic patients (p = 0.001). Also, less aggressive pacing techniques were required to induce ventricular tachycardia in 9 of 14 symptomatic patients compared with 4 of 23 asymptomatic patients (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.u. Schlapfer, F. Rapp, L. Kappenberger, and M. Fromer
Electrophysiologically guided amiodarone therapy versus the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction: Results of long-term follow-up
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2002; 39(11): 1813 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. N. Nanas and J. W. Mason
Pharmacokinetics and Regional Electrophysiological Effects of Intracoronary Amiodarone Administration
Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 451 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. N. FOGOROS, S. B. FIEDLER, and J. J. ELSON
The Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Drug-Refractory Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1987; 107(5): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
J. M. Herre
Advances in the Management of Tachyarrhythmias
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 1987; 2(2): 65 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement