Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 6:298-306
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoenfeld, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruskin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoenfeld, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruskin, J.

Determinants of the outcome of electrophysiologic study in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

MH Schoenfeld, B McGovern, H Garan, E Kelly, G Grant, and JN Ruskin

To determine those factors predictive of the ability to both initiate and suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic study, the results of programmed cardiac stimulation were evaluated in 261 patients: 66 presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, 91 with sustained ventricular tachycardia and 104 with ventricular fibrillation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presenting arrhythmia was a potent and independent predictor of the ability to provoke ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiologic study; a history of myocardial infarction and male sex were also significant independent predictors. Of patients presenting with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 89% (81 of 91) had inducible ventricular arrhythmias compared with 61 (40 of 66) and 66% (69 of 104) of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. Complete suppression of inducible arrhythmias could be achieved in only 52% (34 of 66) of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, compared with 73 (24 of 33) and 75% (46 of 61) of patients presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the major independent determinants of the ability to suppress inducible arrhythmias were the number of drug trials performed before electrophysiologic study (inversely correlated) and the nature of the induced arrhythmia. The nature of the presenting clinical arrhythmia is, therefore, a highly significant and independent predictor of the ability to induce ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing and an important determinant of the ability to suppress induced arrhythmias in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Cappato, S. Boczor, K.-H. Kuck, and on behalf of the CASH Investigators
Response to programmed ventricular stimulation and clinical outcome in cardiac arrest survivors receiving randomised assignment to implantable cardioverter defibrillator or antiarrhythmic drug therapy
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2004; 25(8): 642 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
G. Gronefeld and S. H Hohnloser
What do implantable cardioverter/defibrillators teach us about the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death?
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2001; 50(2): 232 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.P Pell, J Sirel, A.K Marsden, and S.M Cobbe
Sex differences in outcome following community-based cardiopulmonary arrest
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2000; 21(3): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Ruppel, C. A. Schluter, S. Boczor, T. Meinertz, M. Schluter, K.-H. Kuck, and R. Cappato
Ventricular tachycardia during follow-up in patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation: experience from stored electrograms of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1724 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Mehta, J. Curwin, J. A. Gomes, and V. Fuster
Sudden Death in Coronary Artery Disease : Acute Ischemia Versus Myocardial Substrate
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3215 - 3223.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Albert, B. A. McGovern, J. B. Newell, and J. N. Ruskin
Sex Differences in Cardiac Arrest Survivors
Circulation, March 15, 1996; 93(6): 1170 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Raitt, G. L. Dolack, P. J. Kudenchuk, J. E. Poole, and G. H. Bardy
Ventricular Arrhythmias Detected After Transvenous Defibrillator Implantation in Patients With a Clinical History of Only Ventricular Fibrillation : Implications for Use of Implantable Defibrillator
Circulation, April 1, 1995; 91(7): 1996 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. W. Mason and The Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiog
A Comparison of Electrophysiologic Testing with Holter Monitoring to Predict Antiarrhythmic-Drug Efficacy for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
N. Engl. J. Med., August 12, 1993; 329(7): 445 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement