JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985; 6:133-140
© 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skale, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zipes, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skale, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zipes, D.

Inhibition of premature ventricular extrastimuli by subthreshold conditioning stimuli

BT Skale, MJ Kallok, EN Prystowsky, RM Gill, and DP Zipes

The purpose of this study was to determine whether trains of subthreshold high frequency conditioning stimuli (333 Hz, 1 ms duration, 2 ms interval) delivered to the canine ventricle inhibited the response to a premature stimulus (S2) more effectively than did a single subthreshold conditioning stimulus. It was found that trains of conditioning stimuli (mean 1.21 mA) inhibited the response to S2 152 ms beyond expiration of the ventricular effective refractory period, whereas a single conditioning stimulus inhibited S2 only 20 ms or less beyond the ventricular effective refractory period. In late diastole, trains of conditioning stimuli failed to inhibit S2 when the train of stimuli caused ventricular depolarization or the latter occurred in response to the next sinus impulse. Trains of conditioning stimuli did not induce ventricular arrhythmias. Lidocaine or autonomic blockade did not alter the response to trains of conditioning stimuli. Trains of conditioning stimuli or a single conditioning stimulus inhibited the response to S2 only when they were delivered at the same electrode site. By lengthening the ventricular effective refractory period, trains of conditioning stimuli could prevent or terminate tachycardias, but this possibility is constrained, at present, by the spatial limitations of the technique.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
V. Y. Sidorov, M. C. Woods, and F. Baudenbacher
Cathodal stimulation in the recovery phase of a propagating planar wave in the rabbit heart reveals four stimulation mechanisms
J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 237 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H.-N. Pak, Y.-B. Liu, H. Hayashi, Y. Okuyama, P.-S. Chen, and S.-F. Lin
Synchronization of ventricular fibrillation with real-time feedback pacing: implication to low-energy defibrillation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2704 - H2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.