CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
Randomized Comparison of Eptifibatide Versus Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionResults of the EVA-AMI Trial
Uwe Zeymer, MD*, ,*,
Alain Margenet, MD ,
Michael Haude, MD ,
Christoph Bode, MD||,
Jean-Marc Lablanche, MD¶,
Hubertus Heuer, MD#,
Rolf Schröder, MD**,
Stefan Kropff, MD ,
Ryad Bourkaib, MD ,
Norbert Banik, PhD ,
Ralf Zahn, MD* and
Emmanuel Teiger, MD, PhD
* Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
CHU Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
Lukas-Krankenhaus Neuss, Neuss, Germany
|| Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
¶ CHRU de Lille, Lille, France
# St. Johannes Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
** Multizentrische Klinische Studien, Berlin, Germany
 GlaxoSmithKline Europe, London, United Kingdom
Manuscript received June 17, 2009;
revised manuscript received August 10, 2009,
accepted August 17, 2009.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Prof. Dr. Uwe Zeymer, Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstrasse 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany (Email: uwe.zeymer{at}t-online.de).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare eptifibatide and abciximab as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab as adjunct to primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions has been shown to reduce ischemic complications and improve clinical outcomes. So far, no trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of another GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, eptifibatide, and abciximab in primary PCI.
Methods: A total of 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions <12 h and planned primary PCI were randomized to double-bolus eptifibatide (n = 226) followed by a 24-h infusion or single-bolus abciximab (n = 201) followed by a 12-h infusion. In this noninferiority trial, the primary end point was the incidence of complete ( 70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) 60 min after PCI, a measure of myocardial reperfusion. The assumption was a 60% complete STR rate in the abciximab group. The noninferiority margin was set to 15%.
Results: The incidence of complete STR at 60 min after PCI in the intention-to-treat analysis was 62.6% after eptifibatide and 56.3% after abciximab (adjusted difference: 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: 2.7% to 17.0%). All-cause mortality 6.2% versus 4.5% (p = 0.50); reinfarction 0.4% versus 3.5% (p = 0.03); target vessel revascularization 4.4% versus 6.5% (p = 0.40); the combined end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization 10.6% versus 10.9% (p = 0.90); stroke 0.5% versus 0.5% (p = 1.00) after 6 months; and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding complications 4.0% versus 2.0% (p = 0.20) after 30 days were observed after eptifibatide and abciximab, respectively.
Conclusions: Eptifibatide as an adjunct to primary PCI is equally as effective as abciximab with respect to STR. (Efficacy of Eptifibatide Compared to Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI]; NCT00426751)
Key Words: primary percutaneous coronary intervention glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors randomized trial abciximab eptifibatide
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ASA = acetylsalicylic acid | | ECG = electrocardiogram | | GP = glycoprotein | | PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention | | STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | | STR = ST-segment resolution | | TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction |
|
Related Articles
-
The Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Wars: An Update
- Peter B. Berger
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 56: 476-478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 56: A22.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Knight and A. D. Timmis
Almanac 2011: acute coronary syndromes. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology
Heart,
November 15, 2011;
97(22):
1820 - 1827.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Dixon and C. L. Grines
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 31, 2011;
57(22):
2207 - 2220.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y. W. Lew, J. A. C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2010
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 25, 2011;
57(4):
480 - 514.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Developed with the special contribution of the Eur, Authors/Task Force Members, W. Wijns, P. Kolh, N. Danchin, C. Di Mario, V. Falk, T. Folliguet, S. Garg, K. Huber, et al.
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)
Eur. Heart J.,
October 2, 2010;
31(20):
2501 - 2555.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,
September 1, 2010;
38(Supplement_1):
S1 - S52.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Berger
The Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Wars: An Update
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 3, 2010;
56(6):
476 - 478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|