CLINICAL RESEARCH: VASCULAR DISEASE
The General Prognosis of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Differs According to the Disease Localization
Victor Aboyans, MD, PhD*, ,*,
Ileana Desormais, MD*,
Philippe Lacroix, MD*, ,
Johanna Salazar, MD*,
Michael H. Criqui, MD, MPH and
Marc Laskar, MD*
* Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine, Limoges University, Limoges, France
EA3174-IFR 175, Limoges University, Limoges, France
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
Manuscript received March 30, 2009;
revised manuscript received July 22, 2009,
accepted September 24, 2009.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Victor Aboyans, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine, Dupuytren University Hospital, 2, Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges, France (Email: victor.aboyans{at}unilim.fr).
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the general prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) according to the disease localization.
Background: PAD is associated with poor cardiovascular disease prognosis. However, it is unknown whether the general prognosis could differ according to PAD topography.
Methods: Data for all patients who underwent a first digital subtraction angiography of their lower limbs between January 2000 and December 2005 at our hospital were reviewed. Arterial stenoses 50% were located by 2 experienced vascular physicians. The following events were collected until April 2007: death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, and coronary or carotid revascularization. The primary outcome combined all these events.
Results: We studied 400 PAD patients (age 68.3 ± 12.3 years, 77.5% men). Aortoiliac disease (proximal PAD) and infrailiac disease (distal PAD) were noted in 211 (52.8%) and 344 (86.0%) cases, respectively. Male sex and smoking were more prevalent in proximal PAD, whereas older age, diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure were more prevalent in distal PAD (p < 0.05). During the follow-up period (34 ± 23 months), the event-free survival curves differed according to the PAD localization (p < 0.03). Adjusted for age, sex, cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular disease risk factors, critical leg ischemia status, and treatments, proximal PAD was significantly associated with a worse prognosis (primary outcome hazard ratio: 3.28; death hazard ratio: 3.18, p < 0.002 vs. distal PAD).
Conclusions: This is the first study to report a poorer general prognosis of patients with proximal (aortoiliac) PAD compared with those with more distal PAD, independent of risk factors and comorbidities.
Key Words: mortality peripheral arterial disease prognosis
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CVD = cardiovascular disease | | DSA = digital subtraction angiography | | PAD = peripheral arterial disease |
|
Related Article
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A30.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Writing Group Members, V. L. Roger, A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, E. J. Benjamin, J. D. Berry, W. B. Borden, D. M. Bravata, S. Dai, E. S. Ford, et al.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2012 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Circulation,
January 3, 2012;
125(1):
e2 - e220.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Faglia
Characteristics of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Its Relevance to the Diabetic Population
International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds,
September 1, 2011;
10(3):
152 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. Roger, A. S. Go, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, R. J. Adams, J. D. Berry, T. M. Brown, M. R. Carnethon, S. Dai, G. de Simone, E. S. Ford, et al.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2011 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Circulation,
February 1, 2011;
123(4):
e18 - e209.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y. W. Lew, J. A. C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2010
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 25, 2011;
57(4):
480 - 514.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|