QUARTERLY FOCUS ISSUE: HEART RHYTHM DISORDER: CLINICAL RESEARCH: IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR
Evaluation of Early Complications Related to De Novo Cardioverter Defibrillator ImplantationInsights From the Ontario ICD Database
Douglas S. Lee, MD, PhD*, ,*,
Andrew D. Krahn, MD¶,
Jeffrey S. Healey, MD, MSc||,
David Birnie, MBChB#,
Eugene Crystal, MD ,
Paul Dorian, MD ,
Christopher S. Simpson, MD**,
Yaariv Khaykin, MD ,
Douglas Cameron, MD ,
Amir Janmohamed, MD ,
Raymond Yee, MD¶,
Peter C. Austin, PhD*,
Zhongliang Chen, MD, MSc*,
Judy Hardy, RN*,
Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD*, for the Investigators of the Ontario ICD Database
* Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|| Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
¶ London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
# University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
** Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
 Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
 Rouge Valley Health System, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
Manuscript received September 12, 2009;
revised manuscript received November 9, 2009,
accepted November 18, 2009.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Douglas S. Lee, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Room G-106, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada (Email: dlee{at}ices.on.ca).
Objectives: This study examined the predictors of early complications after defibrillator implantation.
Background: Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are widely used, predictors of procedural complications and the consequences of these events have not been determined.
Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, population-based clinical outcomes registry of all newly implanted defibrillator patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complications and all-cause mortality from February 2007 to May 2009. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as direct implant-related or indirect events.
Results: Among 3,340 patients (mean age 63.8 ± 12.5 years, 78.5% men), major complications occurred in 4.1% of de novo procedures. Compared with those undergoing a single-chamber device, implantation of a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38 to 3.43, p < 0.001) or dual-chamber device (adjusted HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.79, p = 0.006) was associated with increased risk of major complications. Major complications were increased in women (adjusted HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.16, p = 0.037) and when left ventricular end-systolic dimension exceeded 45 mm (adjusted HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.20, p = 0.018). Major complications (excluding death) occurring early after defibrillator implantation were associated with increased adjusted risk of subsequent death up to 180 days after defibrillator implant (adjusted HR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.64 to 8.33, p = 0.002). Direct implant-related complications were associated with increased risk of early death (adjusted HR: 24.89, p = 0.01), whereas indirect clinical complications conferred increased risk of near-term death (adjusted HR: 12.35, p < 0.001) after defibrillator implantation.
Conclusions: Complications after de novo defibrillator implantation were strongly associated with device type. Major complications were associated with increased risk of mortality.
Key Words: implantable defibrillators complications outcomes research mortality quality of care
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CI = confidence interval | | HR = hazard ratio | | CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator | | ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
|
Related Article
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A32.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. MacFadden, E. Crystal, A. D. Krahn, I. Mangat, J. S. Healey, P. Dorian, D. Birnie, C. S. Simpson, Y. Khaykin, A. Pinter, et al.
Sex Differences in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Outcomes: Findings From a Prospective Defibrillator Database
Ann Intern Med,
February 7, 2012;
156(3):
195 - 203.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. O'Mahony, P. D. Lambiase, G. Quarta, M. Cardona, M. Calcagnino, K. Tsovolas, S. Al-Shaikh, S. M. Rahman, S. Arnous, S. Jones, et al.
The long-term survival and the risks and benefits of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Heart,
January 15, 2012;
98(2):
116 - 125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Tsai, M. K. Goldstein, H. H. Hsia, Y. Wang, J. Curtis, P. A. Heidenreich, and on behalf of the National Cardiovascular Data's IC
Influence of Age on Perioperative Complications Among Patients Undergoing Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention in the United States
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,
September 1, 2011;
4(5):
549 - 556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Dewland, C. N. Pellegrini, Y. Wang, G. M. Marcus, E. Keung, and P. D. Varosy
Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Selection Is Associated With Increased Complication Rates and Mortality Among Patients Enrolled in the NCDR Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 30, 2011;
58(10):
1007 - 1013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Al-Ahmad and J. V. Freeman
Is Less More?: Dual- Versus Single-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 30, 2011;
58(10):
1014 - 1015.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Landolina, M. Gasparini, M. Lunati, S. Iacopino, G. Boriani, C. Bonanno, A. Vado, A. Proclemer, A. Capucci, C. Zucchiatti, et al.
Long-Term Complications Related to Biventricular Defibrillator Implantation: Rate of Surgical Revisions and Impact on Survival: Insights From the Italian ClinicalService Database
Circulation,
June 7, 2011;
123(22):
2526 - 2535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Krahn, D. S. Lee, D. Birnie, J. S. Healey, E. Crystal, P. Dorian, C. S. Simpson, Y. Khaykin, D. Cameron, A. Janmohamed, et al.
Predictors of Short-Term Complications After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement: Results From the Ontario ICD Database
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
April 1, 2011;
4(2):
136 - 142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Hauser, W. H. Maisel, P. A. Friedman, L. M. Kallinen, A. S. Mugglin, K. Kumar, D. O. Hodge, T. B. Morrison, and D. L. Hayes
Longevity of Sprint Fidelis Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads and Risk Factors for Failure: Implications for Patient Management
Circulation,
February 1, 2011;
123(4):
358 - 363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y. W. Lew, J. A. C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2010
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 25, 2011;
57(4):
480 - 514.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Reynolds and M. R. Gold
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Mild Heart Failure: The Time Has Come
Circulation,
January 18, 2011;
123(2):
195 - 202.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. H. W. Tang and G. S. Francis
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Class I-II Heart Failure and a Wide QRS: A Cautionary Note
Circulation,
January 18, 2011;
123(2):
203 - 208.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cheng, Y. Wang, J. P. Curtis, and P. D. Varosy
Acute Lead Dislodgements and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 9, 2010;
56(20):
1651 - 1656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Poole, M. J. Gleva, T. Mela, M. K. Chung, D. Z. Uslan, R. Borge, V. Gottipaty, T. Shinn, D. Dan, L. A. Feldman, et al.
Complication Rates Associated With Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacements and Upgrade Procedures: Results From the REPLACE Registry
Circulation,
October 19, 2010;
122(16):
1553 - 1561.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Varma, J. Michalski, A. E. Epstein, and R. Schweikert
Automatic Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead and Generator Performance: The Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
October 1, 2010;
3(5):
428 - 436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. V. Freeman, Y. Wang, J. P. Curtis, P. A. Heidenreich, and M. A. Hlatky
The Relation Between Hospital Procedure Volume and Complications of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation From the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 28, 2010;
56(14):
1133 - 1139.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Fein, Y. Wang, J. P. Curtis, F. A. Masoudi, P. D. Varosy, M. R. Reynolds, and National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Prevalence and Predictors of Off-Label Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients Enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardiac-Defibrillator Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 31, 2010;
56(10):
766 - 773.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. H. Maisel and D. B. Kramer
Extracting Guidance From Extraction Data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 17, 2010;
56(8):
651 - 652.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|