Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.





CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010; 55:173-185, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.062
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kern, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Samady, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kern, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Samady, H.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER

Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory

Morton J. Kern, MD*,* and Habib Samady, MD{dagger}

* University of California, Irvine, California
{dagger} Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Manuscript received April 23, 2009; revised manuscript received May 28, 2009, accepted June 9, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Morton J. Kern, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, 333 West City Tower Drive, Suite 400, Room 407, Orange, California 92868-4080 (Email: mkern{at}uci.edu).

Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.

Key Words: angiography • coronary stenoses • severity • physiology

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndrome
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  Cath lab = catheterization laboratory
  CFR = coronary flow reserve
  FFR = fractional flow reserve
  MACE = major adverse cardiac events
  MI = myocardial infarction
  Pa = aortic pressure
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  Pd = mean pressure distal to a stenosis
  QCA = quantitative coronary angiography
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A34. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Abbate, G. Vetrovec, F. Crea, G. A. Diamond, S. Kaul, F. Cuculi, R. Kharbanda, B. Prendergast, C. Bucciarelli-Ducci, D. J. Pennell, et al.
Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography
N. Engl. J. Med., July 1, 2010; 363(1): 92 - 95.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement