CLINICAL RESEARCH: LIPIDS AND CORONARY RISK
Clinical Predictors of Plaque Progression Despite Very Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Ozgur Bayturan, MD*,
Samir Kapadia, MD*,
Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD*, , ,*,
E. Murat Tuzcu, MD*,
Mingyuan Shao, MS*,
Kiyoko Uno, MD, PhD*,
Ajai Shreevatsa, MD||,
Andrea J. Lavoie, MD*,
Kathy Wolski, MPH*,
Paul Schoenhagen, MD*, and
Steven E. Nissen, MD*
* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Center for Cardiovascular Diagnostics and Prevention, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
|| Department of Internal Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Manuscript received October 23, 2009;
revised manuscript received December 10, 2009,
accepted January 2, 2010.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephen J. Nicholls, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Mail Code JJ-65, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (Email: nichols1{at}ccf.org).
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize the determinants of plaque progression despite achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
Background: Despite achieving very low levels of LDL-C, many patients continue to demonstrate disease progression and have clinical events.
Methods: A total of 3,437 patients with coronary artery disease underwent serial intravascular ultrasound examination in 7 clinical trials. Patients who achieved an on-treatment LDL-C level of 70 mg/dl (n = 951) were stratified as progressors (n = 200) and nonprogressors (n = 751) and compared.
Results: Despite achieving LDL-C 70 mg/dl, >20% of patients continued to progress. There were no demographic differences between groups. Progressors demonstrated higher baseline levels of glucose (117.1 ± 42.5 mg/dl vs. 112.1 ± 40.0 mg/dl, p = 0.02), triglycerides (157.5 mg/dl vs. 133.0 mg/dl, p = 0.004), and a smaller decrease of apolipoprotein B (–25.1 ± 3.4 mg/dl vs. –27.4 ± 3.35 mg/dl, p = 0.01) at follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that independently associated risk factors of progression in patients with LDL-C 70 mg/dl included baseline percent atheroma volume (p = 0.001), presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02), increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), less increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.01), and a smaller decrease in apolipoprotein B levels (p = 0.001), but not changes in C-reactive protein (p = 0.78) or LDL-C (p = 0.84).
Conclusions: Residual risk factors are associated with the likelihood of disease progression in patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels. In addition, the association between apolipoprotein B and atheroma progression highlights the potential importance of LDL particle concentration in patients with optimal LDL-C control. This finding highlights the need for intensive modification of global risk in patients with coronary artery disease.
Key Words: low low-density lipoprotein intravascular ultrasound apolipoprotein B atherosclerosis
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | Apo = apolipoprotein | | EEM = external elastic membrane | | HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol | | IVUS = intravascular ultrasound | | LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol | | PAV = percent atheroma volume | | TAV = total atheroma volume |
|
Related Articles
-
More Progression Toward Regression?: Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
- Basil S. Lewis and David A. Halon
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 2743-2744.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A32.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Sanz and V. Fuster
The Year in Atherothrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 16, 2011;
58(8):
779 - 791.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kones
Is prevention a fantasy, or the future of medicine? A panoramic view of recent data, status, and direction in cardiovascular prevention
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease,
February 1, 2011;
5(1):
61 - 81.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y. W. Lew, J. A. C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2010
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 25, 2011;
57(4):
480 - 514.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Lewis and D. A. Halon
More Progression Toward Regression?: Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 15, 2010;
55(24):
2743 - 2744.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|