Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010; 55:2736-2742, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.050
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Cardiosource Journal Scan
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Get Quiz on CME - Click Here for this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayturan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayturan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S. E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: LIPIDS AND CORONARY RISK

Clinical Predictors of Plaque Progression Despite Very Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Ozgur Bayturan, MD*, Samir Kapadia, MD*, Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD*,{dagger},§,*, E. Murat Tuzcu, MD*, Mingyuan Shao, MS*, Kiyoko Uno, MD, PhD*, Ajai Shreevatsa, MD||, Andrea J. Lavoie, MD*, Kathy Wolski, MPH*, Paul Schoenhagen, MD*,{ddagger} and Steven E. Nissen, MD*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{dagger} Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{ddagger} Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
§ Center for Cardiovascular Diagnostics and Prevention, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
|| Department of Internal Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Manuscript received October 23, 2009; revised manuscript received December 10, 2009, accepted January 2, 2010.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephen J. Nicholls, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Mail Code JJ-65, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (Email: nichols1{at}ccf.org).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize the determinants of plaque progression despite achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

Background: Despite achieving very low levels of LDL-C, many patients continue to demonstrate disease progression and have clinical events.

Methods: A total of 3,437 patients with coronary artery disease underwent serial intravascular ultrasound examination in 7 clinical trials. Patients who achieved an on-treatment LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dl (n = 951) were stratified as progressors (n = 200) and nonprogressors (n = 751) and compared.

Results: Despite achieving LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl, >20% of patients continued to progress. There were no demographic differences between groups. Progressors demonstrated higher baseline levels of glucose (117.1 ± 42.5 mg/dl vs. 112.1 ± 40.0 mg/dl, p = 0.02), triglycerides (157.5 mg/dl vs. 133.0 mg/dl, p = 0.004), and a smaller decrease of apolipoprotein B (–25.1 ± 3.4 mg/dl vs. –27.4 ± 3.35 mg/dl, p = 0.01) at follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that independently associated risk factors of progression in patients with LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl included baseline percent atheroma volume (p = 0.001), presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02), increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), less increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.01), and a smaller decrease in apolipoprotein B levels (p = 0.001), but not changes in C-reactive protein (p = 0.78) or LDL-C (p = 0.84).

Conclusions: Residual risk factors are associated with the likelihood of disease progression in patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels. In addition, the association between apolipoprotein B and atheroma progression highlights the potential importance of LDL particle concentration in patients with optimal LDL-C control. This finding highlights the need for intensive modification of global risk in patients with coronary artery disease.

Key Words: low low-density lipoprotein • intravascular ultrasound • apolipoprotein B • atherosclerosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  Apo = apolipoprotein
  EEM = external elastic membrane
  HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
  IVUS = intravascular ultrasound
  LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
  PAV = percent atheroma volume
  TAV = total atheroma volume


Related Articles

More Progression Toward Regression?: Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
Basil S. Lewis and David A. Halon
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 2743-2744. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A32. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Sanz and V. Fuster
The Year in Atherothrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2011; 58(8): 779 - 791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
R. Kones
Is prevention a fantasy, or the future of medicine? A panoramic view of recent data, status, and direction in cardiovascular prevention
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2011; 5(1): 61 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y. W. Lew, J. A. C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2010
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 25, 2011; 57(4): 480 - 514.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. S. Lewis and D. A. Halon
More Progression Toward Regression?: Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2010; 55(24): 2743 - 2744.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home