FOCUS ISSUE: BIOMARKERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: CLINICAL RESEARCH: BIOMARKERS IN CAD
Multimarker Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease RiskThe Women's Health Initiative
Hyeon Chang Kim, MD, PhD*, ,
Philip Greenland, MD*,*,
Jacques E. Rossouw, MD ,
JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH ,
Barbara B. Cochrane, PhD, RN||,
Norman L. Lasser, MD¶,
Marian C. Limacher, MD#,
Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD*,
Karen L. Margolis, MD, MPH*
* and
Jennifer G. Robinson, MD, MPH
* Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
|| Family and Child Nursing Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
¶ Preventive Cardiology Program, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
# Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
** Health Partners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
 Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Manuscript received July 7, 2009;
revised manuscript received November 4, 2009,
accepted December 16, 2009.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Philip Greenland, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 750 North Lake Shore Drive, 11th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60611 (Email: p-greenland{at}northwestern.edu).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether multiple biomarkers contribute to improved coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction in post-menopausal women compared with assessment using traditional risk factors (TRFs) only.
Background: The utility of newer biomarkers remains uncertain when added to predictive models using only TRFs for CHD risk assessment.
Methods: The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials enrolled 27,347 post-menopausal women ages 50 to 79 years. Associations of TRFs and 18 biomarkers were assessed in a nested case-control study including 321 patients with CHD and 743 controls. Four prediction equations for 5-year CHD risk were compared: 2 Framingham risk score covariate models; a TRF model including statin treatment, hormone treatment, and cardiovascular disease history as well as the Framingham risk score covariates; and an additional biomarker model that additionally included the 5 significantly associated markers of the 18 tested (interleukin-6, D-dimer, coagulation factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and homocysteine).
Results: The TRF model showed an improved C-statistic (0.729 vs. 0.699, p = 0.001) and net reclassification improvement (6.42%) compared with the Framingham risk score model. The additional biomarker model showed additional improvement in the C-statistic (0.751 vs. 0.729, p = 0.001) and net reclassification improvement (6.45%) compared with the TRF model. Predicted CHD risks on a continuous scale showed high agreement between the TRF and additional biomarker models (Spearman's coefficient = 0.918). Among the 18 biomarkers measured, C-reactive protein level did not significantly improve CHD prediction either alone or in combination with other biomarkers.
Conclusions: Moderate improvement in CHD risk prediction was found when an 18-biomarker panel was added to predictive models using TRFs in post-menopausal women.
Key Words: coronary heart disease prediction biomarker
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ABM = additional biomarker | | CEE = conjugated equine estrogen 0.625 mg/day | | CHD = coronary heart disease | | CRP = C-reactive protein | | CVD = cardiovascular disease | | FRSN = Framingham risk score with new coefficients | | FRSO = Framingham risk score with original coefficients | | HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol | | MPA = medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg/day | | TC = total cholesterol | | TRF = traditional risk factor |
|
Related Articles
-
Multiple Biomarkers for Predicting Cardiovascular Events: Lessons Learned
- Thomas J. Wang
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 2092-2095.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A34.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kivimaki, S. T. Nyberg, G. D. Batty, M. J. Shipley, J. E. Ferrie, M. Virtanen, M. G. Marmot, J. Vahtera, A. Singh-Manoux, and M. Hamer
Authors' response to: Can information on life stress improve CHD risk prediction in clinical practice?
Int. J. Epidemiol.,
January 27, 2012;
(2012)
dyr214v1.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Beckie, J. W. Beckstead, and M. W. Groer
The Association Between Variants on Chromosome 9p21 and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Ethnically Diverse Women With Coronary Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Biol Res Nurs,
July 1, 2011;
13(3):
306 - 319.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Blaha, J. J. Rivera, M. J. Budoff, R. Blankstein, A. Agatston, D. H. O'Leary, M. Cushman, S. Lakoski, M. H. Criqui, M. Szklo, et al.
Association Between Obesity, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein >=2 mg/L, and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Implications of JUPITER from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
June 1, 2011;
31(6):
1430 - 1438.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kivimaki, G. D. Batty, M. Hamer, J. E. Ferrie, J. Vahtera, M. Virtanen, M. G. Marmot, A. Singh-Manoux, and M. J. Shipley
Using Additional Information on Working Hours to Predict Coronary Heart Disease: A Cohort Study
Ann Intern Med,
April 5, 2011;
154(7):
457 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Daniels and A. S. Maisel
Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease: to have or have not
Eur. Heart J.,
December 2, 2010;
31(24):
2980 - 2983.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Wang
Multiple Biomarkers for Predicting Cardiovascular Events: Lessons Learned
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 11, 2010;
55(19):
2092 - 2095.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|