Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010; 55:2080-2091, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.047
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow View CVN Interview
Right arrow View Interview
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

FOCUS ISSUE: BIOMARKERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE: CLINICAL RESEARCH: BIOMARKERS IN CAD

Multimarker Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Risk

The Women's Health Initiative

Hyeon Chang Kim, MD, PhD*,{dagger}, Philip Greenland, MD*,*, Jacques E. Rossouw, MD{ddagger}, JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH§, Barbara B. Cochrane, PhD, RN||, Norman L. Lasser, MD, Marian C. Limacher, MD#, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD*, Karen L. Margolis, MD, MPH* * and Jennifer G. Robinson, MD, MPH{dagger}{dagger}

* Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
{dagger} Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
{ddagger} National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
§ Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
|| Family and Child Nursing Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Preventive Cardiology Program, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
# Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
** Health Partners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
{dagger}{dagger} Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Manuscript received July 7, 2009; revised manuscript received November 4, 2009, accepted December 16, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Philip Greenland, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 750 North Lake Shore Drive, 11th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60611 (Email: p-greenland{at}northwestern.edu).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether multiple biomarkers contribute to improved coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction in post-menopausal women compared with assessment using traditional risk factors (TRFs) only.

Background: The utility of newer biomarkers remains uncertain when added to predictive models using only TRFs for CHD risk assessment.

Methods: The Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials enrolled 27,347 post-menopausal women ages 50 to 79 years. Associations of TRFs and 18 biomarkers were assessed in a nested case-control study including 321 patients with CHD and 743 controls. Four prediction equations for 5-year CHD risk were compared: 2 Framingham risk score covariate models; a TRF model including statin treatment, hormone treatment, and cardiovascular disease history as well as the Framingham risk score covariates; and an additional biomarker model that additionally included the 5 significantly associated markers of the 18 tested (interleukin-6, D-dimer, coagulation factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and homocysteine).

Results: The TRF model showed an improved C-statistic (0.729 vs. 0.699, p = 0.001) and net reclassification improvement (6.42%) compared with the Framingham risk score model. The additional biomarker model showed additional improvement in the C-statistic (0.751 vs. 0.729, p = 0.001) and net reclassification improvement (6.45%) compared with the TRF model. Predicted CHD risks on a continuous scale showed high agreement between the TRF and additional biomarker models (Spearman's coefficient = 0.918). Among the 18 biomarkers measured, C-reactive protein level did not significantly improve CHD prediction either alone or in combination with other biomarkers.

Conclusions: Moderate improvement in CHD risk prediction was found when an 18-biomarker panel was added to predictive models using TRFs in post-menopausal women.

Key Words: coronary heart disease • prediction • biomarker

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ABM = additional biomarker
  CEE = conjugated equine estrogen 0.625 mg/day
  CHD = coronary heart disease
  CRP = C-reactive protein
  CVD = cardiovascular disease
  FRSN = Framingham risk score with new coefficients
  FRSO = Framingham risk score with original coefficients
  HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
  MPA = medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg/day
  TC = total cholesterol
  TRF = traditional risk factor


Related Articles

Multiple Biomarkers for Predicting Cardiovascular Events: Lessons Learned
Thomas J. Wang
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 2092-2095. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A34. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Kivimaki, S. T. Nyberg, G. D. Batty, M. J. Shipley, J. E. Ferrie, M. Virtanen, M. G. Marmot, J. Vahtera, A. Singh-Manoux, and M. Hamer
Authors' response to: Can information on life stress improve CHD risk prediction in clinical practice?
Int. J. Epidemiol., January 27, 2012; (2012) dyr214v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
T. M. Beckie, J. W. Beckstead, and M. W. Groer
The Association Between Variants on Chromosome 9p21 and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Ethnically Diverse Women With Coronary Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2011; 13(3): 306 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. J. Blaha, J. J. Rivera, M. J. Budoff, R. Blankstein, A. Agatston, D. H. O'Leary, M. Cushman, S. Lakoski, M. H. Criqui, M. Szklo, et al.
Association Between Obesity, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein >=2 mg/L, and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Implications of JUPITER from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2011; 31(6): 1430 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Kivimaki, G. D. Batty, M. Hamer, J. E. Ferrie, J. Vahtera, M. Virtanen, M. G. Marmot, A. Singh-Manoux, and M. J. Shipley
Using Additional Information on Working Hours to Predict Coronary Heart Disease: A Cohort Study
Ann Intern Med, April 5, 2011; 154(7): 457 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. B. Daniels and A. S. Maisel
Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease: to have or have not
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2010; 31(24): 2980 - 2983.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. J. Wang
Multiple Biomarkers for Predicting Cardiovascular Events: Lessons Learned
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 11, 2010; 55(19): 2092 - 2095.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement