CLINICAL RESEARCH: INTERVENTION IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
Long-Term Pulmonary Regurgitation Following Balloon Valvuloplasty for Pulmonary StenosisRisk Factors and Relationship to Exercise Capacity and Ventricular Volume and Function
David M. Harrild, MD, PhD*,
Andrew J. Powell, MD,
Trang X. Trang, MPH, BS,
Tal Geva, MD,
James E. Lock, MD,
Jonathan Rhodes, MD and
Doff B. McElhinney, MD
Departments of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Manuscript received October 28, 2009;
revised manuscript received December 23, 2009,
accepted January 2, 2010.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David M. Harrild, Bader 2, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 (Email: david.harrild{at}cardio.chboston.org).
Objectives: This study sought to examine the prevalence and predictors of pulmonary regurgitation (PR) following balloon dilation (BD) for pulmonary stenosis (PS) and to investigate its impact on ventricular volume and function, and exercise tolerance.
Background: Balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty relieves PS but can cause late PR. The sequelae of isolated PR are not well understood.
Methods: Patients were at least 7 years of age and 5 years removed from BD, and had no other form of congenital heart disease or significant residual PS. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and exercise testing were performed prospectively to quantify PR fraction, ventricular volumes and function, and exercise capacity.
Results: Forty-one patients underwent testing a median of 13.1 years after BD. The median PR fraction was 10%; 14 patients (34%) had PR fraction >15%; 7 (17%) had PR >30%. PR fraction was associated with age at dilation (ln-transformed, R = –0.47, p = 0.002) and balloon:annulus ratio (R = 0.57, p < 0.001). The mean right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume z-score was 1.8 ± 1.9; RV dilation (z-score 2) was present in 14/35 patients (40%). PR fraction correlated closely with indexed RV end-diastolic volume (R = 0.79, p < 0.001) and modestly with RV ejection fraction (R = 0.50, p < 0.001). Overall, peak oxygen consumption (VO
2) (% predicted) was below average (92 ± 17%, p = 0.006). Patients with PR fraction >15% had significantly lower peak VO
2 than those with less PR (85 ± 17% vs. 96 ± 16%, p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Mild PR and RV dilation are common in the long term following BD. A PR fraction >15% is associated with lower peak VO
2, suggesting that isolated PR and consequent RV dilation are related to impaired exercise cardiopulmonary function.
Key Words: pulmonary regurgitation exercise function balloon valvuloplasty pulmonary stenosis right ventricular dilation
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | BAR = balloon: annulus ratio | | BD = balloon dilation | | CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance | | EF = ejection fraction | | LV = left ventricle/ventricular | | PR = pulmonary regurgitation | | PS = pulmonary stenosis | | RV = right ventricle/ventricular | | TR = tricuspid regurgitation | | VE/VCO2 = ratio of minute ventilation:carbon dioxide production | | VO
2
= oxygen consumption |
|
Related Articles
-
Balloon Pulmonary Valvuloplasty, Pulmonary Regurgitation, and Exercise Capacity: The Good, the Bad, and the Not Yet Clear
- Larry A. Latson
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: 1048-1049.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55: A29.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y. W. Lew, J. A. C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2010
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 25, 2011;
57(4):
480 - 514.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rhodes, A. Ubeda Tikkanen, and K. J. Jenkins
Exercise Testing and Training in Children With Congenital Heart Disease
Circulation,
November 9, 2010;
122(19):
1957 - 1967.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Latson
Balloon Pulmonary Valvuloplasty, Pulmonary Regurgitation, and Exercise Capacity: The Good, the Bad, and the Not Yet Clear
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 9, 2010;
55(10):
1048 - 1049.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|