Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:860-865, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.079
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bach, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kohnstamm, S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bach, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kohnstamm, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE

Failure of Guideline Adherence for Intervention in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation

David S. Bach, MD*, Mazen Awais, MD, Hitinder S. Gurm, MD and Sarah Kohnstamm, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Manuscript received January 6, 2009; revised manuscript received March 16, 2009, accepted March 16, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David S. Bach, CVC Room 2147, SPC 5853, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5853 (Email: dbach{at}umich.edu).

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the incidence with which adult patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) do not undergo surgical intervention despite guideline recommendations, and the associated considerations resulting in no intervention.

Background: Despite the existence of accepted guidelines, many patients with severe symptomatic heart valve disease might not undergo intervention.

Methods: At a single large tertiary medical center, patients were retrospectively identified who had moderate-to-severe or severe MR on echocardiographic imaging during 2005. Clinical data were reviewed to determine indications for intervention and whether surgery was performed.

Results: During 2005, 300 patients were identified with significant MR, including 188 with functional MR and 112 with organic MR. Mitral surgery was performed in 30 of 188 patients with functional MR, mostly to treat heart failure or during another cardiac surgical procedure. Mitral surgery was performed in 59 (53%) of 112 patients with organic MR. Among unoperated patients with organic MR, common reasons included stable left ventricular size or function, absence of symptoms, and prohibitive comorbidities. Using American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, 1 or more indication for intervention was present in 39 (74%) of 53 unoperated patients. Perioperative mortality risk was not higher for patients who did not undergo surgery (median 1.2%, interquartile range [IQR] 0.4% to 3.3%) than for those who did (median 1.1%, IQR 0.6% to 5.3%; p = 0.71). During follow-up, there were 12 cardiac and 2 unexplained deaths.

Conclusions: Among patients with severe organic MR, surgical intervention occurred in approximately one-half. However, accepted guideline indications for intervention were present in the majority of unoperated patients. Objectively assessed operative risk was not prohibitive in many unoperated patients.

Key Words: mitral regurgitation • mitral valve surgery • operative risk • guidelines • adherence/compliance

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACC = American College of Cardiology
  AHA = American Heart Association
  EF = ejection fraction
  IQR = interquartile range
  LV = left ventricle/ventricular
  MR = mitral regurgitation


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A28. [Full Text] [PDF]





 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement