CLINICAL RESEARCH: HEART RHYTHM DISORDER
Efficacy of Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular CardiomyopathyA Report From the North American ARVC Registry
Gregory M. Marcus, MD*,*,
David V. Glidden, PhD ,
Bronislava Polonsky, MS ,
Wojciech Zareba, MD, PhD ,
Lisa M. Smith, MPH*,
David S. Cannom, MD ,
N.A. Mark Estes, III, MD||,
Frank Marcus, MD¶,
Melvin M. Scheinman, MD* for the Multidisciplinary Study of Right Ventricular Dysplasia Investigators
* Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, California
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California
Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California
|| Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
¶ Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona
Manuscript received February 23, 2009;
revised manuscript received March 16, 2009,
accepted April 3, 2009.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gregory M. Marcus, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MUE 434, San Francisco, California 94143-1354 (Email: marcusg{at}medicine.ucsf.edu).
Objectives: This study sought to examine the efficacy of empiric antiarrhythmic drugs in a rigorously characterized cohort of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients.
Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are important in protecting against ventricular arrhythmias in ARVC, but no studies have provided data in a group rigorously screened for the disease.
Methods: Antiarrhythmic medicines were examined in all subjects with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) enrolled in the North American ARVC Registry. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to account for time on each drug, and a hierarchical analysis was performed for repeated measures within individuals.
Results: Ninety-five patients were studied, with a mean follow-up of 480 ± 389 days. Fifty-eight (61%) received beta-blockers, and these medicines were not associated with an increased or decreased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Sotalol was associated with a greater risk of any clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia as defined by sustained ventricular tachycardia or ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 6.39, p = 0.045), but this was not statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounders. An increased risk of any ICD shock and first clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia while on sotalol remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Those on amiodarone (n = 10) had a significantly lower risk of any clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmia (HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.95, p = 0.041), a finding that remained significant after multivariable adjustment.
Conclusions: In a cohort of well-characterized ARVC subjects, neither beta-blockers nor sotalol seemed to be protective. Evidence from a small number of patients suggests that amiodarone has superior efficacy in preventing ventricular arrhythmias.
Key Words: ARVC ARVD antiarrhythmic drugs ventricular arrhythmias ICD
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ARVC = arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy | | CI = confidence interval | | HR = hazard ratio | | ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator | | IQR = interquartile range | | VF = ventricular fibrillation | | VT = ventricular tachycardia |
|
Related Articles
-
Empiric Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: Pragmatism or Anachronism?
- L. Brent Mitchell
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 616-617.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A24.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Raju, C. Alberg, G. S. Sagoo, H. Burton, and E. R. Behr
Inherited cardiomyopathies
BMJ,
November 21, 2011;
343(nov21_2):
d6966 - d6966.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. J. Krul, J. J. van der Smagt, M. P. van den Berg, K. M. Sollie, P. G. Pieper, and K. Y. van Spaendonck-Zwarts
Systematic review of pregnancy in women with inherited cardiomyopathies
Eur J Heart Fail,
June 1, 2011;
13(6):
584 - 594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Pinamonti, A. M. Dragos, S. A. Pyxaras, M. Merlo, A. Pivetta, G. Barbati, A. Di Lenarda, T. Morgera, L. Mestroni, and G. Sinagra
Prognostic predictors in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from a 10-year registry
Eur. Heart J.,
May 1, 2011;
32(9):
1105 - 1113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Riley, E. Zado, R. Bala, D. J. Callans, J. Cooper, S. Dixit, F. Garcia, E. P. Gerstenfeld, M. D. Hutchinson, D. Lin, et al.
Lack of Uniform Progression of Endocardial Scar in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Tachycardia
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,
August 1, 2010;
3(4):
332 - 338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. DeMaria, J. J. Bax, O. Ben-Yehuda, G. K. Feld, B. H. Greenberg, J. Hall, M. Hlatky, W. Y.W. Lew, J. A.C. Lima, A. S. Maisel, et al.
Highlights of the Year in JACC 2009
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 26, 2010;
55(4):
380 - 407.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Mitchell
Empiric Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: Pragmatism or Anachronism?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 11, 2009;
54(7):
616 - 617.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|