Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:220-228, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.006
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maron, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maron, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

FOCUS ISSUE: HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY: CLINICAL RESEARCH

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Phenotype Revisited After 50 Years With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Martin S. Maron, MD*,*, Barry J. Maron, MD{dagger}, Caitlin Harrigan, BA*, Jacki Buros, BA{ddagger}, C. Michael Gibson, MD, MS{ddagger},§, Iacopo Olivotto, MD||, Leah Biller, BA{dagger}, John R. Lesser, MD{dagger}, James E. Udelson, MD*, Warren J. Manning, MD{ddagger},§ and Evan Appelbaum, MD{ddagger},§

* Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
{ddagger} PERFUSE Core Laboratory and Data Coordinating Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
|| Regional Referral Center for Myocardial Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy

Manuscript received February 13, 2009; revised manuscript received April 30, 2009, accepted May 5, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Martin S. Maron, Tufts Medical Center, #70, 800 Washington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 (Email: mmaron{at}tuftsmedialcenter.org).

Objectives: Our purpose was to characterize the pattern and distribution of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to more precisely define phenotypic expression and its clinical implications in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Background: Based on prior pathologic and 2-dimensional echocardiographic studies, HCM has been regarded as a disease characterized by substantial LV wall thickening.

Methods: Cine and late gadolinium enhancement CMR were performed in 333 consecutive HCM patients (age 43 ± 17 years).

Results: Basal anterior LV free wall and the contiguous anterior ventricular septum were the most commonly hypertrophied segments (n = 256; 77%). LV hypertrophy was focal (involving ≤2 segments [≤12% of LV]) in 41 patients (12%), intermediate (3 to 7 segments [13% to 49% of LV]) in 112 patients (34%), and diffuse (≥8 segments [≥50% of LV]) in 180 patients (54%); 42 patients (13%) showed hypertrophied segments separated by regions of normal thickness. The number of hypertrophied segments was greater in patients with LV outflow tract obstruction (≥30 mm Hg) than without (10 ± 4 vs. 8 ± 4 per patient; p = 0.0001) and was associated with an advanced New York Heart Association functional class (p = 0.007). LV wall thickness was greater in segments with late gadolinium enhancement than without (20 ± 6 mm vs. 16 ± 6 mm; p < 0.001). We also identified 40 (12%) of HCM patients with segmental LV hypertrophy largely confined to the anterolateral free wall, posterior septum, or apex, which was underestimated or undetected by echocardiography.

Conclusions: Although diverse, patterns of LV hypertrophy are usually not extensive in HCM, involving ≤50% of the chamber in about one-half the patients, and are particularly limited in extent in an important minority. Contiguous portions of anterior free wall and septum constituted the predominant region of wall thickening, with implications for clinical diagnosis. These observations support an emerging role for CMR in the contemporary evaluation of patients with HCM.

Key Words: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy • hypertrophy • magnetic resonance imaging • fibrosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  LGE = late gadolinium enhancement
  LV = left ventricle/ventricular
  NYHA = New York Heart Association


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A24. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B J Maron
Distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart physiological remodelling: clinical significance, diagnostic strategies and implications for preparticipation screening
Br. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2009; 43(9): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement