QUARTERLY FOCUS ISSUE: PREVENTION/OUTCOMES: CLINICAL RESEARCH: LIPID-LOWERING AND TOTAL CARDIOVASCULAR BURDEN
Reduction in Recurrent Cardiovascular Events With Intensive Lipid-Lowering Statin Therapy Compared With Moderate Lipid-Lowering Statin Therapy After Acute Coronary SyndromesFrom the PROVE IT–TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) Trial
Sabina A. Murphy, MPH,
Christopher P. Cannon, MD*,
Stephen D. Wiviott, MD,
Carolyn H. McCabe, BS and
Eugene Braunwald, MD
TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Manuscript received May 7, 2009;
revised manuscript received September 30, 2009,
accepted October 12, 2009.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Christopher P. Cannon, TIMI Study Group, 350 Longwood Avenue, First Floor, Boston Massachusetts 02115 (Email: cpcannon{at}partners.org).
Objectives: In addition to reducing first events in patients after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we hypothesized that high-dose atorvastatin 80 mg would also reduce recurrent cardiovascular events, and therefore total events, compared with pravastatin 40 mg during the 2-year follow-up.
Background: In the PROVE IT–TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) trial, more intensive lipid lowering with high-dose atorvastatin reduced the first occurrence of the primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, stroke, or revascularization 30 days) compared with moderate lipid lowering with pravastatin.
Methods: Poisson regression analysis was performed to compare the number of occurrences of the primary end point between high-dose atorvastatin and pravastatin in the PROVE IT–TIMI 22 trial.
Results: As previously reported, first primary end point events were reduced by 16% with atorvastatin 80 mg versus pravastatin 40 mg (n = 464 vs. n = 537, respectively; p = 0.005). Additional events were also reduced by 19% with atorvastatin 80 mg (n = 275 vs. n = 340, respectively; p = 0.009). Overall, there were 138 fewer primary efficacy events with atorvastatin 80 mg versus pravastatin 40 mg (n = 739 vs. n = 877, respectively; rate ratio: 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.77 to 0.94, p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Although analytic techniques commonly used in clinical outcomes trials censor patients who experience a component of the primary composite end point, total cardiovascular events are important to patients, clinicians, and health care payers. Maintaining low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is central to preventing additional atherosclerotic development and subsequent cardiovascular events. Atorvastatin 80 mg, a more intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering agent, reduced both first and subsequent primary end point events compared with pravastatin 40 mg after ACS.
Key Words: statin acute coronary syndrome lipid lowering clinical trial
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | ACS = acute coronary syndrome | | CRP = C-reactive protein | | LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol | | MI = myocardial infarction | | UA = unstable angina |
|
Related Articles
-
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Should Time to First Event for "Hard" End Points Remain the Standard Approach?
- Steven E. Nissen
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 2363-2365.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A35.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Smith Jr, E. J. Benjamin, R. O. Bonow, L. T. Braun, M. A. Creager, B. A. Franklin, R. J. Gibbons, S. M. Grundy, L. F. Hiratzka, D. W. Jones, et al.
AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients With Coronary and Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation Endorsed by the World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 29, 2011;
58(23):
2432 - 2446.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Smith Jr, E. J. Benjamin, R. O. Bonow, L. T. Braun, M. A. Creager, B. A. Franklin, R. J. Gibbons, S. M. Grundy, L. F. Hiratzka, D. W. Jones, et al.
AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients With Coronary and Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation
Circulation,
November 29, 2011;
124(22):
2458 - 2473.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Knight and A. D. Timmis
Almanac 2011: acute coronary syndromes. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology
Heart,
November 15, 2011;
97(22):
1820 - 1827.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Preiss, S. R. K. Seshasai, P. Welsh, S. A. Murphy, J. E. Ho, D. D. Waters, D. A. DeMicco, P. Barter, C. P. Cannon, M. S. Sabatine, et al.
Risk of Incident Diabetes With Intensive-Dose Compared With Moderate-Dose Statin Therapy: A Meta-analysis
JAMA,
June 22, 2011;
305(24):
2556 - 2564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Mills, C. O'Regan, O. Eyawo, P. Wu, F. Mills, O. Berwanger, and M. Briel
Intensive statin therapy compared with moderate dosing for prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of >40 000 patients
Eur. Heart J.,
June 1, 2011;
32(11):
1409 - 1415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Hlatky and P. A. Heidenreich
The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 10, 2011;
57(19):
1859 - 1866.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Goldfine, V. Fonseca, and S. E. Shoelson
Therapeutic Approaches to Target Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes
Clin. Chem.,
February 1, 2011;
57(2):
162 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Lewis and D. A. Halon
More Progression Toward Regression?: Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 15, 2010;
55(24):
2743 - 2744.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Nissen
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Randomized Trials: Should Time to First Event for "Hard" End Points Remain the Standard Approach?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 15, 2009;
54(25):
2363 - 2365.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|