Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1872-1882, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.071
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmarian, J. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmarian, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

The Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Provide Independent and Complementary Prediction of Cardiac Risk

Su Min Chang, MD, Faisal Nabi, MD, Jiaqiong Xu, PhD, Leif E. Peterson, PhD, Arup Achari, MD, Craig M. Pratt, MD and John J. Mahmarian, MD*

Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center and The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas

Manuscript received March 19, 2009; revised manuscript received May 7, 2009, accepted May 25, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. John J. Mahmarian, Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, 6550 Fannin Street, Suite 677, Houston, Texas 77030 (Email: jmahmarian{at}tmhs.org).

Objectives: This study sought to examine the relationship between coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) results for predicting the short- and long-term risk of cardiac events.

Background: The CACS and SPECT results both provide important prognostic information. It is unclear whether integrating these tests will better predict patient outcome.

Methods: We followed-up 1,126 generally asymptomatic subjects without previous cardiovascular disease who had a CACS and stress SPECT scan performed within a close time period (median 56 days). The median follow-up was 6.9 years. End points analyzed were total cardiac events and all-cause death/myocardial infarction (MI).

Results: An abnormal SPECT result increased with increasing CACS from <1% (CACS ≤10) to 29% (CACS >400) (p < 0.001). Total cardiac events and death/MI also increased with increasing CACS and abnormal SPECT results (p < 0.001). In subjects with a normal SPECT result, CACS added incremental prognostic information, with a 3.55-fold relative increase for any cardiac event (2.75-fold for death/MI) when the CACS was severe (>400) versus minimal (≤10). Separation of the survival curves occurred at 3 years after initial testing for all cardiac events and at 5 years for death/MI.

Conclusions: The CACS and SPECT findings are independent and complementary predictors of short- and long-term cardiac events. Despite a normal SPECT result, a severe CACS identifies subjects at high long-term cardiac risk. After a normal SPECT result, our findings support performing a CACS in patients who are at intermediate or high clinical risk for coronary artery disease to better define those who will have a high long-term risk for adverse cardiac events.

Key Words: coronary artery calcium • myocardial perfusion imaging • risk stratification

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CACS = coronary artery calcium score
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  ECG = electrocardiogram/electrocardiographic
  LV = left ventricular
  MI = myocardial infarction
  PDS = perfusion defect size
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A32. [Full Text] [PDF]





 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement