Advertisement







Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1434-1437, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.062
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waters, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ku, I.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waters, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ku, I.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

VIEWPOINT AND COMMENTARY

Early Statin Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes

The Successful Cycle of Evidence, Guidelines, and Implementation

David D. Waters, MD* and Ivy Ku, MD

Division of Cardiology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California; and the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California

Manuscript received May 6, 2009; accepted May 11, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. David D. Waters, Division of Cardiology, Room 5G1, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California 94114 (Email: dwaters{at}medsfgh.ucsf.edu).

That statins should be prescribed for patients before hospital discharge after an episode of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a Level of Evidence: 1A recommendation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Task Force. This level of recommendation is based upon 2 clinical trials: the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering) and PROVE-IT (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) trials. In the MIRACL trial, 3,086 patients with unstable angina or non–Q-wave myocardial infarction were randomized within 4 days of the event to atorvastatin 80 mg/day or to placebo and followed for 16 weeks. The primary composite end point occurred in 14.8% of atorvastatin patients and 17.4% of placebo patients, a 16% relative risk reduction (p = 0.048). In the PROVE-IT trial, 4,162 patients hospitalized with an ACS within the preceding 10 days were randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day or pravastatin 40 mg/day and were followed for a mean of 24 months. The primary event rate was 22.4% in the atorvastatin group and 26.3% in the pravastatin group, a 16% relative risk reduction (p = 0.005). A strong trend toward a reduction in total mortality was seen in the atorvastatin group (2.2% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.07). Using a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for ACS, the difference between the treatment groups is already statistically significant at 30 days and remains so throughout the follow-up period. Comprehensive treatment programs in ACS patients that include initiation of statins before hospital discharge have been shown to improve outcomes such as recurrent myocardial infarction and total mortality at 1 year. Guidelines prove their utility when their implementation improves outcomes across a broad population at risk, such as in this instance.

Key Words: statins • low-density lipoprotein • unstable angina • myocardial infarction • guidelines • cardiovascular outcomes

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndrome
  CHD = coronary heart disease
  LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
  MI = myocardial infarction


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A26. [Full Text] [PDF]





 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement