Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1258-1267, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.018
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

QUARTERLY FOCUS ISSUE: PREVENTION/OUTCOMES: COST-EFFECTIVENESS

Induced Cardiovascular Procedural Costs and Resource Consumption Patterns After Coronary Artery Calcium Screening

Results From the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) Study

Leslee J. Shaw, PhD*, James K. Min, MD{dagger}, Matthew Budoff, MD{ddagger}, Heidi Gransar, MS§, Alan Rozanski, MD||, Sean W. Hayes, MD§, John D. Friedman, MD§, Romalisa Miranda, MPH§, Nathan D. Wong, PhD and Daniel S. Berman, MD§,*

* Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
{dagger} Weill Medical College of Cornell University, The New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
{ddagger} Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
§ Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
|| St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York
University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California

Manuscript received March 27, 2009; revised manuscript received June 8, 2009, accepted July 6, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Daniel S. Berman, Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Room 1258, Los Angeles, California 90048 (Email: bermand{at}cshs.org).

Objectives: We prospectively evaluated procedural costs and resource consumption patterns in the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) study after coronary calcium (CAC) measurements.

Background: Controversy surrounds expansion of cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening to include atherosclerosis imaging as the result of concern whether induced costs will outweigh any benefit.

Methods: Detailed risk factor and CAC measurements with 4-year follow-up for CVD death or myocardial infarction and procedures were performed. Costs were estimated with the use of Medicare reimbursement rates (discounted and inflation corrected). Cox survival analysis was used to estimate procedures and events.

Results: CAC scores varied widely but were skewed toward low scores with 56.7% of screened subjects having CAC scores ≤10 and only 8.2% having CAC scores ≥400. Noninvasive testing was infrequent and medical costs were low among subjects with low CAC scores, both rising progressively with increasing CAC scores (p < 0.001), particularly in the 31 (2.2% of subjects) that had CAC scores ≥1,000. Similarly, invasive coronary angiography rose progressively with increasing scores (p < 0.001) but occurred exclusively among subjects first undergoing noninvasive testing and overall, was performed in only 19.4% of subjects with CAC scores ≥1,000.

Conclusions: CAC scanning is associated with a marked differential in downstream frequency of medical tests and costs, ranging from a very low frequency of testing and invasive procedures among a predominantly large percentage of subjects with low CAC scores, to selectively concentrated testing and procedures among a small number of subjects with CAC scores >400. Thus, CAC scanning appears to foster efficient selective testing patterns among asymptomatic individuals at risk for CVD.

Key Words: screening • cost • utilization • prognosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAC = coronary artery calcium/calcification
  CCTA = coronary computed tomographic angiography
  CVD = cardiovascular disease
  ECG = electrocardiographic/electrocardiogram
  FRS = Framingham Risk Score
  HU = Hounsfield units
  ICA = invasive coronary angiography
  MI = myocardial infarction


Related Articles

Selective Use of Coronary Artery Calcium Screening: Worth the Cost?
Roger S. Blumenthal, Chao-Wei Hwang, and Khurram Nasir
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 1268-1270. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A26. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. S. Blumenthal, C.-W. Hwang, and K. Nasir
Selective use of coronary artery calcium screening: worth the cost?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 29, 2009; 54(14): 1268 - 1270.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement