Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1072-1084, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blankstein, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cury, R. C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blankstein, R.
Right arrow Articles by Cury, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Adenosine-Induced Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Dual-Source Cardiac Computed Tomography

Ron Blankstein, MD*,{dagger},*, Leon D. Shturman, MD*, Ian S. Rogers, MD, MBA*, Jose A. Rocha-Filho, MD*, David R. Okada, MD*, Ammar Sarwar, MD*, Anand V. Soni, MD*, Hiram Bezerra, MD*,{ddagger}, Brian B. Ghoshhajra, MD, MBA*, Milena Petranovic, MD*, Ricardo Loureiro, MD*, Gudrun Feuchtner, MD*,§, Henry Gewirtz, MD*, Udo Hoffmann, MD, MPH*, Wilfred S. Mamuya, MD, PhD*,||, Thomas J. Brady, MD* and Ricardo C. Cury, MD*

* Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology and Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Harrington McLaughlin Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
§ Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
|| Lown Cardiovascular Group, Brookline, Massachusetts
Cardiovascular MR and CT Program, Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida

Manuscript received February 2, 2009; revised manuscript received May 18, 2009, accepted June 2, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Ron Blankstein, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology and Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (Email: rblankstein{at}partners.org).

Objectives: This study sought to determine the feasibility of performing a comprehensive cardiac computed tomographic (CT) examination incorporating stress and rest myocardial perfusion imaging together with coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Background: Although cardiac CT can identify coronary stenosis, very little data exist on the ability to detect stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects in humans.

Methods: Thirty-four patients who had a nuclear stress test and invasive angiography were included in the study. Dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) was performed as follows: 1) stress CT: contrast-enhanced scan during adenosine infusion; 2) rest CT: contrast-enhanced scan using prospective triggering; and 3) delayed scan: acquired 7 min after rest CT. Images for CTA, computed tomography perfusion (CTP), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were each read by 2 independent blinded readers.

Results: The DSCT protocol was successfully completed for 33 of 34 subjects (average age 61.4 ± 10.7 years; 82% male; body mass index 30.4 ± 5 kg/m2) with an average radiation dose of 12.7 mSv. On a per-vessel basis, CTP alone had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 80% for the detection of stenosis ≥50%, whereas SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging had a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 83%. For the detection of vessels with ≥50% stenosis with a corresponding SPECT perfusion abnormality, CTP had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 74%. The CTA during adenosine infusion had a per-vessel sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 73%, and negative predictive value of 98% for the detection of stenosis ≥70%.

Conclusions: Adenosine stress CT can identify stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects with diagnostic accuracy comparable to SPECT, with similar radiation dose and with the advantage of providing information on coronary stenosis.

Key Words: infarction • ischemia • imaging • coronary disease • computed tomography

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CT = computed tomography
  CTA = computed tomography angiography
  CTP = computed tomography perfusion
  DE = delayed enhancement
  DSCT = dual-source computed tomography
  MPHR = maximal predicted heart rate
  MPI = myocardial perfusion imaging
  MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography


Related Articles

Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion: Steps, Questions, and Layers
Stephan Achenbach
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: 1085-1087. [Full Text] [PDF]

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A22. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
N. T. Wijesekera, M. K. Duncan, and S. P. G. Padley
X-ray computed tomography of the heart
Br. Med. Bull., November 17, 2009; (2009) ldp043v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Achenbach
Stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion: steps, questions, and layers.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2009; 54(12): 1085 - 1087.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement