Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1-15, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.065
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lautamäki, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lautamäki, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

STATE-OF-THE-ART PAPER

Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography

Frank M. Bengel, MD*, Takahiro Higuchi, MD, Mehrbod S. Javadi, MD and Riikka Lautamäki, MD, PhD

Division of Nuclear Medicine/PET, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Manuscript received November 13, 2008; revised manuscript received January 27, 2009, accepted February 23, 2009.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Frank M. Bengel, Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, 601 North Caroline Street/JHOC 3225, Baltimore, Maryland 21287 (Email: fbengel1{at}jhmi.edu).

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful, quantitative imaging modality that has been used for decades to noninvasively investigate cardiovascular biology and physiology. Due to limited availability, methodologic complexity, and high costs, it has long been seen as a research tool and as a reference method for validation of other diagnostic approaches. This perception, fortunately, has changed significantly within recent years. Increasing diversity of therapeutic options for coronary artery disease, and increasing specificity of novel therapies for certain biologic pathways, has resulted in a clinical need for more accurate and specific diagnostic techniques. At the same time, the number of PET centers continues to grow, stimulated by PET's success in oncology. Methodologic advances as well as improved radiotracer availability have further contributed to more widespread use. Evidence for diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of myocardial perfusion and viability assessment by PET is increasing. Some studies suggest overall cost-effectiveness of the technique despite higher costs of a single study, because unnecessary follow-up procedures can be avoided. The advent of hybrid PET-computed tomography (CT), which enables integration of PET-derived biologic information with multislice CT-derived morphologic information, and the key role of PET in the development and translation of novel molecular-targeted imaging compounds, have further contributed to more widespread acceptance. Today, PET promises to play a leading diagnostic role on the pathway toward a future of high-powered, comprehensive, personalized, cardiovascular medicine. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art in current imaging methodology and clinical application, and outlines novel developments and future directions.

Key Words: positron emission tomography • myocardial perfusion • myocardial viability • hybrid imaging • molecular imaging

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CFR = coronary flow reserve
  CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  CT = computed tomography
  FDA = Food and Drug Administration
  FDG = fluorodeoxyglucose
  MBF = myocardial blood flow
  PET = positron emission tomography
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography


Related Article

Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 54: A22. [Full Text] [PDF]





 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement