CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
Long-Term Prognosis After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Related to the Extent of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling at Midterm Follow-Up
Claudia Ypenburg, MD*,
Rutger J. van Bommel, MD*,
C. Jan Willem Borleffs, MD*,
Gabe B. Bleeker, MD, PhD*,
Eric Boersma, PhD ,
Martin J. Schalij, MD, PhD* and
Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD*,*
* Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Manuscript received August 11, 2008;
revised manuscript received October 15, 2008,
accepted October 19, 2008.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jeroen J. Bax, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands (Email: j.j.bax{at}lumc.nl).
Objectives: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relation between the extent of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and clinical/echocardiographic improvement after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome.
Background: Despite the current selection criteria, individual response to CRT varies significantly. Furthermore, it has been suggested that reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) after CRT is related to outcome.
Methods: A total of 302 CRT candidates were included. Clinical status and echocardiographic evaluation were performed before implantation and after 6 months of CRT. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure.
Results: Based on different extents of LV reverse remodeling, 22% of patients were classified as super-responders (decrease in LVESV 30%), 35% as responders (decrease in LVESV 15% to 29%), 21% as nonresponders (decrease in LVESV 0% to 14%), and 22% negative responders (increase in LVESV). More extensive LV reverse remodeling resulted in more clinical improvement, with a larger increase in LV function and more reduction in mitral regurgitation. In addition, more LV reverse remodeling resulted in less heart failure hospitalizations and lower mortality during long-term follow-up (22 ± 11 months); 1- and 2-year hospitalization-free survival rates were 90% and 70% in the negative responder group compared with 98% and 96% in the super-responder group (log-rank p value <0.001).
Conclusions: The extent of LV reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up is predictive for long-term outcome in CRT patients.
Key Words: cardiac resynchronization therapy reverse remodeling echocardiography heart failure prognosis
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy | | LBBB = left bundle branch block | | LV = left ventricle/ventricular | | LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume | | LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction | | LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume | | NYHA = New York Heart Association |
|
Related Article
-
Inside This Issue
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: A26.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cabrera-Bueno, M. J. Molina-Mora, J. Alzueta, J. Pena-Hernandez, M. Jimenez-Navarro, J. Fernandez-Pastor, A. Barrera, and E. de Teresa
Persistence of secondary mitral regurgitation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur J Echocardiogr,
November 24, 2009;
(2009)
jep184v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Sassone, L. Gabrieli, S. Sacca, G. Boggian, A. Fusco, C. Pratola, M. L. Bacchi-Reggiani, L. Padeletti, and S. S. Barold
Value of right ventricular-left ventricular interlead electrical delay to predict reverse remodelling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the INTER-V pilot study
Europace,
November 6, 2009;
(2009)
eup347v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W.X. Foley, F. Leyva, and M. P. Frenneaux
What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Europace,
November 1, 2009;
11(suppl_5):
v58 - v65.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. van Bommel, J. J. Bax, W. T. Abraham, E. S. Chung, L. A. Pires, L. Tavazzi, P. J. Zimetbaum, B. Gerritse, N. Kristiansen, and S. Ghio
Characteristics of heart failure patients associated with good and poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to CRT) sub-analysis
Eur. Heart J.,
October 2, 2009;
30(20):
2470 - 2477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F. Tops, M. J. Schalij, and J. J. Bax
The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 25, 2009;
54(9):
764 - 776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. J. Gademan, R. J. van Bommel, C. J. W. Borleffs, S. Man, J. C. W. Haest, M. J. Schalij, E. E. van der Wall, J. J. Bax, and C. A. Swenne
Biventricular pacing-induced acute response in baroreflex sensitivity has predictive value for midterm response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
July 1, 2009;
297(1):
H233 - H237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Sanderson
Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy selection: fatally flawed or misjudged?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 26, 2009;
53(21):
1960 - 1964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|