CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
Heart Failure Decompensation and All-Cause Mortality in Relation to Percent Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart FailureIs a Goal of 100% Biventricular Pacing Necessary?
Bruce A. Koplan, MD, MPH*,*,
Andrew J. Kaplan, MD ,
Stan Weiner, MD ,
Paul W. Jones, MS ,
Milan Seth, MS|| and
Shelly A. Christman, PhD
* Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Banner Heart Hospital, Mesa, Arizona
Tyler Cardiovascular Consultants, Tyler, Texas
Boston Scientific Corporation, St. Paul, Minnesota
|| The Integra Group, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota
Manuscript received July 8, 2008;
revised manuscript received September 8, 2008,
accepted September 25, 2008.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Bruce A. Koplan, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cardiovascular Division, 75 Francis Street, Tower 3A, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 (Email: bkoplan{at}partners.org).
Objectives: The goal of this analysis was to determine the appropriate biventricular pacing target in patients with heart failure (HF).
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) decreases the risk of death and HF hospitalization. However, the appropriate amount of biventricular pacing is ill-defined.
Methods: Mortality and HF hospitalization data from patients undergoing CRT in 2 trials (CRT RENEWAL [Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry Evaluating Patient Response with RENEWAL Family Devices] and REFLEx [ENDOTAK RELIANCE G Evaluation of Handling and Electrical Performance Study]; n = 1,812) were analyzed in a post-hoc fashion. Subjects were grouped based on percent biventricular pacing quartiles with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Results: Subjects were age 72 ± 11 years; 72% were men and 67% had coronary artery disease. Subjects paced 93% to 100% (quartiles 2 to 4) had a 44% reduction in hazard of an event compared with subjects paced 0% to 92% (quartile 1; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56, p < 0.00001). Subjects paced 98% to 99% (quartile 3) had similar outcomes as subjects paced 93% to 97% (quartile 2; HR: 0.97, p = 0.82). Subjects paced 100% (quartile 4) had similar outcomes as subjects paced 98% to 99% (HR: 0.78, p = 0.17). There was a significant interaction between a history of atrial arrhythmia and percent pacing. Subjects with a history of atrial arrhythmia were more likely to be paced 92% (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: For CRT patients in this retrospective analysis, the greatest magnitude of benefit was observed with >92% biventricular pacing.
Key Words: cardiac resynchronization heart failure pacing
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AF = atrial fibrillation | | ATR = atrial tachycardia response | | CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy | | HF = heart failure | | HR = hazard ratio | | IV = intravenous | | NYHA = New York Heart Association | | Q = quartile | | VRR = ventricular rate regulation |
|
Related Articles
-
A Dose Response for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
- Mitchell N. Faddis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: 361-362.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Inside This Issue of JACC
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: A20.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Bogale, S. Priori, J. G. F. Cleland, J. Brugada, C. Linde, A. Auricchio, D. J. van Veldhuisen, T. Limbourg, A. Gitt, D. Gras, et al.
The European CRT Survey: 1 year (9-15 months) follow-up results
Eur J Heart Fail,
January 1, 2012;
14(1):
61 - 73.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Tournoux, J. P. Singh, R. C. Chan, A. Chen-Tournoux, D. McCarty, R. Manzke, J. N. Ruskin, M. Semigran, E. K. Heist, S. Moore, et al.
Absence of left ventricular apical rocking and atrial-ventricular dyssynchrony predicts non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,
January 1, 2012;
13(1):
86 - 94.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K. Heist, M. Mansour, and J. N. Ruskin
Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Targets, Methods, Resynchronization Considerations
Circulation,
December 13, 2011;
124(24):
2746 - 2755.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Nolker, K.-J. Gutleben, S. Asbach, G. Ritscher, H. Marschang, A. M. Sinha, P. Boileau, M. E. Benser, B. Hallier, A. Hummer, et al.
Dynamic ventricular overdrive stimulation in atrial fibrillation: effects on ventricular rate irregularity, ventricular pacing, and fusion beats
Europace,
December 1, 2011;
13(12):
1688 - 1694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Gold, U. Birgersdotter-Green, J. P. Singh, K. A. Ellenbogen, Y. Yu, T. E. Meyer, M. Seth, and P. J. Tchou
The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur. Heart J.,
October 2, 2011;
32(20):
2516 - 2524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Brignole, G. Botto, L. Mont, S. Iacopino, G. De Marchi, D. Oddone, M. Luzi, J. M. Tolosana, A. Navazio, and C. Menozzi
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients undergoing atrioventricular junction ablation for permanent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial
Eur. Heart J.,
October 1, 2011;
32(19):
2420 - 2429.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sack, C. M. Wende, H. Nagele, A. Katz, W. R. Bauer, C. S. Barr, K. Malinowski, H. Schwacke, F. Leyva, J. Proff, et al.
Potential value of automated daily screening of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator diagnostics for prediction of major cardiovascular events: results from Home-CARE (Home Monitoring in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study
Eur J Heart Fail,
September 1, 2011;
13(9):
1019 - 1027.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Boriani, M. Gasparini, M. Landolina, M. Lunati, A. Proclemer, G. Lonardi, S. Iacopino, W. Rahue, M. Biffi, P. DiStefano, et al.
Incidence and clinical relevance of uncontrolled ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur J Heart Fail,
August 1, 2011;
13(8):
868 - 876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Dickstein, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-C. Daubert, C. Linde, J. McMurray, P. Ponikowski, S. G. Priori, R. Sutton, et al.
2010 Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: An update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association
Eur. Heart J.,
November 1, 2010;
31(21):
2677 - 2687.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Dickstein, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-C. Daubert, C. Linde, J. McMurray, P. Ponikowski, S. G. Priori, R. Sutton, et al.
2010 Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: An update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC Guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy * Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association
Eur J Heart Fail,
November 1, 2010;
12(11):
1143 - 1153.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Dickstein, P. E. Vardas, A. Auricchio, J.-C. Daubert, C. Linde, J. McMurray, P. Ponikowski, S. G. Priori, R. Sutton, et al.
2010 Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: An update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC Guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy * Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association
Europace,
November 1, 2010;
12(11):
1526 - 1536.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Whellan, K. T. Ousdigian, S. M. Al-Khatib, W. Pu, S. Sarkar, C. B. Porter, B. B. Pavri, C. M. O'Connor, and for the PARTNERS Study Investigators
Combined Heart Failure Device Diagnostics Identify Patients at Higher Risk of Subsequent Heart Failure Hospitalizations: Results From PARTNERS HF (Program to Access and Review Trending Information and Evaluate Correlation to Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
April 27, 2010;
55(17):
1803 - 1810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Gasparini and A. Cappelleri
Atrial arrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization therapy: an inverse correlation with achieving 100% biventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy effectiveness
Europace,
January 1, 2010;
12(1):
9 - 10.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Leclercq
Problems and troubleshooting in regular follow-up of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
Europace,
November 1, 2009;
11(suppl_5):
v66 - v71.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Faddis
A Dose Response for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 27, 2009;
53(4):
361 - 362.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|