This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Online Appendix View Related Cardiosource Journal Scan Correction (v53,p1474) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Budoff, M. J. Articles by Kronmal, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Budoff, M. J. Articles by Kronmal, R. A. Related Collections Related Articles

CLINICAL RESEARCH: CARDIAC IMAGING

Coronary Calcium Predicts Events Better With Absolute Calcium Scores Than Age-Sex-Race/Ethnicity Percentiles

MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis)

Matthew J. Budoff, MD^_*,_*, Khurram Nasir, MD, Robyn L. McClelland, PhD, Robert Detrano, MD, PhD, Nathan Wong, PhD, Roger S. Blumenthal, MD^||, George Kondos, MD^¶ and Richard A. Kronmal, PhD

^_* Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–UCLA, Torrance, California
Cardiac MRI PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Division of Cardiology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California
^|| Ciccarone Preventive Cardiology Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
^¶ Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois

Manuscript received June 10, 2008; accepted July 13, 2008.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Matthew J. Budoff, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, RB2, Torrance, California 90502 (Email: Budoff{at}ucla.edu).

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to establish whether age-sex–specific percentiles of coronary artery calcium (CAC) predict cardiovascular outcomes better than the actual (absolute) CAC score.

Background: The presence and extent of CAC correlates with the overall magnitude of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and with the development of subsequent coronary events.

Methods: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) is a prospective cohort study of 6,814 asymptomatic participants followed for coronary heart disease (CHD) events including myocardial infarction, angina, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or CHD death. Time to incident CHD was modeled with Cox regression, and we compared models with percentiles based on age, sex, and/or race/ethnicity to categories commonly used (0, 1 to 100, 101 to 400, 400+ Agatston units).

Results: There were 163 (2.4%) incident CHD events (median follow-up 3.75 years). Expressing CAC in terms of age- and sex-specific percentiles had significantly lower area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) than when using absolute scores (women: AUC 0.73 versus 0.76, p = 0.044; men: AUC 0.73 versus 0.77, p < 0.001). Akaike's information criterion indicated better model fit with the overall score. Both methods robustly predicted events (>90th percentile associated with a hazard ratio [HR] of 16.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.30 to 28.9, and score >400 associated with HR of 20.6, 95% CI: 11.8 to 36.0). Within groups based on age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific percentiles there remains a clear trend of increasing risk across levels of the absolute CAC groups. In contrast, once absolute CAC category is fixed, there is no increasing trend across levels of age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific categories. Patients with low absolute scores are low-risk, regardless of age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific percentile rank. Persons with an absolute CAC score of >400 are high risk, regardless of percentile rank.

Conclusions: Using absolute CAC in standard groups performed better than age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific percentiles in terms of model fit and discrimination. We recommend using cut points based on the absolute CAC amount, and the common CAC cut points of 100 and 400 seem to perform well.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • cardiac CT • coronary calcium • prognosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CAC = coronary artery calcium   CACS = coronary artery calcium score   CHD = coronary heart disease   CI = confidence interval   CT = computed tomography   EBT = electron beam tomography   ECG = electrocardiogram   MI = myocardial infarction   NCEP ATP III = National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III

Related Articles

Are You as Old as Your Arteries or as Old as Your Coronary Artery Calcification Score?

François Schiele and Nicolas Meneveau
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53: 353-354. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Peralta, K. L. Adeney, M. G. Shlipak, D. Jacobs Jr, D. Duprez, D. Bluemke, J. Polak, B. Psaty, and B. R. Kestenbaum Structural and Functional Vascular Alterations and Incident Hypertension in Normotensive Adults: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Am. J. Epidemiol., November 30, 2009; (2009) kwp319v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Brundage Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2009; 54(6): 574 - 574. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Budoff and K. Nasir Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2009; 54(6): 574 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Schiele and N. Meneveau Are you as old as your arteries or as old as your coronary artery calcification score? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 27, 2009; 53(4): 353 - 354. [Full Text] [PDF]